Feat/ecosystem integrations - #227
Merged
Merged
Conversation
trustabl
approved these changes
Sep 24, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ecosystem integrations
Where Trustabl fits in each agent ecosystem it analyses, and where to find it
listed.
Trustabl is a static analyzer. It reads an agent repository, inventories the
agents, tools, subagents, skills and MCP servers in it, and evaluates each one
against a versioned rule pack. It does not run your agent, and scanning happens
entirely on your machine.
This page exists so that a developer arriving from one of these ecosystems can
tell, quickly, what Trustabl does for their framework and where the official
listing lives.
Agent frameworks
Every framework below is covered by the rule packs today. The order is the order
we are pursuing an official listing in each ecosystem's own directory.
These three are analysed the same way, but their ecosystems publish no
integrations directory, so there is nowhere to list:
Rules are versioned separately from the engine and fetched at scan time, so a
scan picks up new detections for these frameworks without upgrading the binary.
MCP
Trustabl analyses MCP servers as a first-class scope: tool annotations, caller-
controlled URLs, missing titles, and tools that shell out.
Trustabl also ships an MCP server of its own, so an agent can run a scan as a
tool call. It is built into the CLI —
trustabl mcpruns a stdio MCP serverexposing a
scantool backed by the same analysis astrustabl scan:{ "mcpServers": { "trustabl": { "command": "trustabl", "args": ["mcp"] } } }Registry listing: not listed.
Policy and standards
See
attestation.mdfor the attestation format.Editors and CI
Trustabl already ships integrations for these surfaces. They are listed on their
own marketplaces rather than here:
A note on coverage
"Not listed" means there is no official directory entry, not that the framework
is unsupported — every framework in the tables above is covered by the rule
packs. Where a framework has no integrations directory, there is nowhere to list.
If you maintain one of these ecosystems and want an integration page, open an
issue.