Repository navigation
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Closing without merging. The .prax syntax and examples for every block now live in the Praxity Studio format reference (prax-format), not in the pattern READMEs. These write-distractors examples will be added there. 🤖 Generated with Claude Code |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds a "Write this in .prax" section for write-distractors, with original English and French examples. Covers the question, answer and misconception/option syntax, generated IDs, count settings, device-only practice, label comparison, browser printing, PDF workbooks and author constraints. The French example uses narrow no-break spaces and typographic apostrophes.
Validation:
node --test: 391 passed.npm run typecheck,npm run types,npm run types:check,npm run budget,git diff --check: passed.5b161802a88787009b4edf418c1fb46c26ff143e, with zero diagnostics and no runtime refusal. Full author content, generated IDs, explicit count and default count were checked.The Studio publication condition is met by commit
5b16180, merged on 2026-10-20. Both examples now cite that first-supporting commit, have been rechecked, and describe current behaviour. Browser print includes current writing and only revealed content. The PDF workbook includes the question, instructions and writing space; an explicitly requested answer sheet adds the right answer and numbered labels with their paired wrong options. This PR stays a draft pending owner approval.Review: 0/2/4; fixes 6. Opus 5.5: syntax and learner behaviour match Studio's reference; both examples are original and compile with only the expected publication refusal; nothing private in the README, commit or body. Fixed French spacing inside guillemets and before punctuation (narrow no-break spaces, typographic apostrophes), present-tense print and PDF claims (now marked planned; Studio can't preview or put the block in a PDF workbook yet), the PDF wording, the draft condition in the body, and added the author constraints.