Skip to content

docs: refresh README for current main - #92

Merged
abdulsaheel merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/readme-refresh
Oct 9, 2026
Merged

abdulsaheel merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/readme-refresh

Conversation

@abdulsaheel

@abdulsaheel abdulsaheel commented Oct 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Refreshes the README to match what is on main today (no unreleased features claimed).

Prepared for owner review; not merged.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by Sourcery

Update the README to match the current main branch without documenting unreleased functionality.

Enhancements:

  • Clarify the README’s description of training-load metrics, including how strain and TRIMP effort scores are calculated.

Documentation:

  • Refresh the README to accurately reflect the currently available clinical capabilities and metric behavior.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Clarified that Banister/Edwards TRIMP and CTL/ATL/TSB training load scores use the user’s quiet-waking heart rate as their reference level.

@sourcery-ai

sourcery-ai Bot commented Oct 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Refreshes the README to accurately describe the currently implemented clinical training-load behavior, without introducing claims about unreleased features.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Updates the clinical module README description to document the current training-load strain baseline.
  • Clarifies that strain is scored relative to the user’s own quiet waking heart-rate level rather than a fixed population reference.
  • Leaves the surrounding clinical capabilities and sleep-module documentation unchanged.
README.md

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review in Change Stack →

Note

Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait...

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: ASSERTIVE
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: a8ecb955-4987-4268-be82-53e96e539a40

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4ec3fa2 and d1cad54.


📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md

 ____________________________________________
< I feel the need - the need for clean code! >
 --------------------------------------------
  \
   \   (\__/)
       (•ㅅ•)
       /   づ

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: ASSERTIVE
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: e8967959-cc08-434a-aeb2-596e756564e1

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b7d5819 and 4ec3fa2.


📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.



📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The README now states that Banister/Edwards TRIMP and CTL/ATL/TSB strain scores use the user’s quiet-waking heart-rate level as their reference.

Changes

Training Load Documentation

Layer / File(s) Summary
Clarify training-load reference
README.md
The training-load description identifies the user’s quiet-waking heart-rate level as the reference for scoring strain.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Change: Other


Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 4ec3f

The README accurately scopes the quiet-waking reference to strain. No material issue remains, so the PR is ready to merge subject to normal checks.

Pre-merge checks | Passed 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check Passed The title clearly identifies the documentation change and states that the README was refreshed for the current main branch.
Docstring Coverage Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.


  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey - I've found 1 issue

Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:

## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location path="README.md" line_range="98-99" />
<code_context>
   LF/HF), PRSA (deceleration/acceleration capacity), nocturnal RHR/dip, an illness-risk
   CUSUM state machine, Plews ln-RMSSD readiness, Baevsky stress index, Banister/Edwards
-  TRIMP + CTL/ATL/TSB training load, a Poincaré irregular-rhythm screen, cosinor circadian
+  TRIMP + CTL/ATL/TSB training load (strain is scored above the user's own quiet waking
+  heart-rate level, not a fixed population reference), a Poincaré irregular-rhythm screen, cosinor circadian
   fitting, and real-time cardiac coherence for guided breathing sessions.
 - **`sleep/`** — van Hees z-angle segmentation feeding a cardiac/motion stager (the
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**Strain scores imply a personal baseline**

When a caller uses the public `trimpStrain` API, `trimpStrain` maps raw Banister TRIMP directly to 0–100 without a quiet-waking baseline, so ordinary waking is counted as strain despite the README’s claim that strain is scored above the user’s baseline.

Clarify that the baseline adjustment does not apply to `trimpStrain`.
</issue_to_address>

Sourcery assessment

Approval pending. 1 finding to address first.

Blocking findings: README.md:99


Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

Comment thread README.md Outdated
@abdulsaheel
abdulsaheel merged commit d9ab017 into main Oct 9, 2026
3 of 4 checks passed

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sourcery assessment

Approved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant