-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 352
Enhancement: Run Zammad with a non-superuser PostgreSQL role #611
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
fliebe92
wants to merge
5
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
postgresql-least-privilege-role
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a6738ec
Enhancement: Run Zammad with a non-superuser PostgreSQL role
fliebe92 b8561e4
Follow-up: Keep the compose file self-contained and enforce role sepa…
fliebe92 41412c5
Follow-up: Prove the database is usable in the PostgreSQL healthcheck
fliebe92 0c97bae
Follow-up: Drop a stale reference to the removed hook file
fliebe92 9c28119
Follow-up: Stage the restore after stopping the stack in the migratio…
fliebe92 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will not work with portainer scenarios.
I'm not sure if complicating the docker stack like this is worth it in the end.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, you are right and I fixed it in b8561e4 — the external file is gone and the hook is now inlined as
configs.content, sodocker-compose.ymlis self-contained again and can be deployed as-is.I verified this by copying only
docker-compose.ymlinto an empty directory and starting it there: Compose materialises the script in the container, the$$escapes are resolved to the container's own variables, and the role and database get created. That covers the Portainer web editor and anyone who just copies the file, not only the repository build method.This also removes the upgrade burden I had originally written into the release note draft — there is no extra file for existing deployments to pick up anymore.
On "is it worth it in the end": your call, and I am happy to drop it. My case for keeping it, briefly:
docker-compose.yml, no new file, no new service, no new container.The real cost I would like to name honestly: the hook is no longer covered by shellcheck now that it lives in YAML, and the
POSTGRESQL_DB_CREATEdefault change affects people running against an external database server. If either of those tips the balance for you, say so and I will close this in favour of leaving the stack as it is.