Skip to content

[Tests] Nightly lmeval tests - #3004

Open
kylesayrs wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
lmeval-config-updates
Open

[Tests] Nightly lmeval tests#3004
kylesayrs wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
lmeval-config-updates

Conversation

@kylesayrs

@kylesayrs kylesayrs commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Purpose

  • More frequent lm eval tests to catch failures earlier

Co-requisites

Changes

  • Set cadence of all tests to nightly
  • Add fp8 block test

Testing

configs (h100-solo): 1h 35m 18s
vl_configs (h100-solo): 47m 21s
distributed_configs (h100-duo): 29m 15s

…stale configs

- Change w4a4_nvfp4 and w4a16_actorder_weight cadence from weekly to nightly
- Add FP8 block quantization config with nightly cadence (calibrated thresholds)
- Disable fp8_static_per_tensor and w4a16_actorder_group by moving to disabled_configs/

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to llm-compressor. Please add the ready label when the PR is ready for review.

Note: This is required to complete the testing suite, please only add the label once the PR is code complete and local testing has been performed.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: f34ae569-e61d-4601-bc6d-7953d09c12dc

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the cadence of several evaluation configurations from "weekly" to "nightly" and introduces a new configuration file fp8_block.yaml. Feedback was provided regarding the new configuration file, which is missing the dataset_id and dataset_split fields required by the evaluation pipeline.

Comment thread tests/lmeval/configs/fp8_block.yaml
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@dsikka dsikka left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI, based on the benchmarking we’ve done + conversations with Michael, fp8 static per tensor may have better performance than dynamic per token and should maybe be a path we focus on more

kylesayrs and others added 2 commits August 7, 2026 08:58
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@dsikka dsikka left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would make two changes:

  1. Just remove the disabled one
  2. Keep the configs in the same configs folder - just add both cadences, weekly and nightly and update the cadence handling logic to consider multiple options so that we can be sure that the tests run both during a nightly run or a weekly run

Signed-off-by: Kyle Sayers <kylesayrs@gmail.com>
@kylesayrs kylesayrs changed the title Update lm_eval test configs: cadence, FP8 block, disable stale [Tests] Nightly lmeval tests Aug 11, 2026
@mergify

mergify Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Merge Protections

🔴 1 of 1 protections blocking · waiting on 👀 reviews

Protection Waiting on
🔴 Require one maintainer review 👀 reviews

🔴 Require one maintainer review

Waiting for any of

  • approved-reviews-by=HDCharles
  • approved-reviews-by=brian-dellabetta
  • approved-reviews-by=dsikka
  • approved-reviews-by=kylesayrs
  • approved-reviews-by=yiliu30
This rule is failing.

All PRs must have at least one approving review from a maintainer before merging.

  • any of:
    • approved-reviews-by=HDCharles
    • approved-reviews-by=brian-dellabetta
    • approved-reviews-by=dsikka
    • approved-reviews-by=kylesayrs
    • approved-reviews-by=yiliu30
  • #changes-requested-reviews-by = 0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants