Skip to content

Calibration strategies for cross section models #188

Description

@MattBrst

Referring to the Combined calibration notebook (ZIP file here) that @dbrakenhoff presented at the TIM workshop in Delft on 29th June 2026.

In this notebook, the importance of the following parameters was emphasized:

  1. Aquifer diffusivity
  2. Ratio of the leakage factors $\lambda = \sqrt{kHc}$ between the river and the polder

Just some thoughts from my side:

  1. Would it make sense to use the diffusivity as calibration parameter (e.g.: cal.set_parameter_by_reference(name="D", ...)) instead of fitting on Saq and keeping kaq fixed?
  2. Would it make sense to use the lambda values (or the ratio of lambdas) as calibration parameters?

The advantage might be that we have fewer parameters to fit on. As a postprocessing step we then should calculate reasonable kaq, Saq, c values from the derived diffusivity and lambda values.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions