Repository navigation
Breaking: refuse repeated Deep Agents activity names instead of dropping them #175
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
campoy
wants to merge
4
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
fix/deep-agents-python-activity-dedupe-silent-drop
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d5c15ca
Breaking: refuse repeated Deep Agents activity names instead of dropp…
campoy a46d587
Skip only repeated registrations in the Deep Agents both-sides case
campoy 01b5e42
Compare Deep Agents activity registrations by identity
campoy 8c6ae70
Refuse a differently built second Deep Agents plugin
campoy File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
P3: this line consumes a one-shot iterable before
SimplePlugin.configure_workerreads the same object, so caller Activities passed as a generator are dropped without an error whenever this plugin configures the Worker first. Probe:Worker(client_with_plugin, workflows=[...], activities=(a for a in [fetch]))registers only the fourdeepagents.*names at this head. Main's path (SimplePlugin.configure_worker, then the name dedupe) also registersfetch, and the SDK on its own iteratesactivitiesonly once. This happens with or without a second instance. The parameter is typedSequence[Callable], so this input is outside the contract, but the failure has #174's shape: an Activity goes missing with no error until a Workflow schedules it. Fix: after taking the copy, write a separate list back when the key is set (if config.get('activities') is not None: config['activities'] = list(before)). It must be a separate list, so that a callableactivitiessetting that appends in place cannot changebefore. Non-blocking.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed in 8c6ae70 as you suggested: after taking the copy,
configure_workerwrites a separate list back whenactivitiesis set. The keep test has asame-instance-generatorsetup that passes a generator of[fetch]. It fails at 01b5e42 (nofetch) and passes now.