Skip to content

chore: re-add multi-track sprint file as sole active (#289)#306

Merged
sungjunlee merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/readd-multitrack-sprint
Jul 12, 2026
Merged

chore: re-add multi-track sprint file as sole active (#289)#306
sungjunlee merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/readd-multitrack-sprint

Conversation

@sungjunlee

@sungjunlee sungjunlee commented Jul 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Re-adds backlog/sprints/2026-07-multi-track-sprints.md (held out of #296 while a second active sprint was still illegal) as the sole active track, now that the tracker-adapter sprint closed. Content from 78981eb, refreshed: #290/#291/#293 ticked with merged PRs, Running Context carries the shared scopesOverlap contract + G4 anchor notes, Progress records the landings.

Live backlog-doctor on this branch: all 8 checks PASS, exit hint pass, reassess quiet.

Refs #289.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 문서
    • 2026-07 멀티 트랙 스프린트 운영 계획을 추가했습니다.
    • 컴포넌트별 독립 트랙을 동시에 운영하는 방식과 단일 트랙의 기존 동작 보존 원칙을 정의했습니다.
    • 병렬 처리, 중복 범위 검증, 단계별 진행 항목 및 통합 계약 버전 관리 계획을 정리했습니다.
    • 2026-07-11~12 진행 상황과 완료된 배치 작업을 기록했습니다.

Held out of #296 because a second active sprint was illegal pre-#293;
the tracker-adapter sprint has since closed (1d47692), so this returns
as the sole active track. Content from 78981eb, refreshed: #290/#291/
#293 ticked with their merged PRs, Running Context notes the shared
scopesOverlap contract and the G4 anchor, Progress records the landings.

Refs #289.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@sungjunlee sungjunlee merged commit b832ab2 into main Jul 12, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: cf983420-d32b-46ff-a5b8-3c3583c206fb

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5effa2d and eb909a5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • backlog/sprints/2026-07-multi-track-sprints.md

Walkthrough

2026-07 멀티 트랙 스프린트의 메타데이터, 전환 목표, 단계별 작업, 운영 제약 및 Batch 1–3 진행 이력을 새 스프린트 문서에 기록한다.

Changes

멀티 트랙 스프린트 운영 계획

Layer / File(s) Summary
스프린트 메타데이터와 목표
backlog/sprints/2026-07-multi-track-sprints.md
2026-07 스프린트의 상태와 목적, disjoint-scope 다중 트랙 및 단일 트랙 바이트 동일성 목표를 정의한다.
단계별 작업 계획
backlog/sprints/2026-07-multi-track-sprints.md
RED gate, resolver 기반, 병렬 안전성, HUMANGATED spec 수정, 문서 및 계약 스키마 버전 작업과 진행 상태를 정리한다.
운영 제약과 진행 이력
backlog/sprints/2026-07-multi-track-sprints.md
싱글턴 계약, scopesOverlap() 재사용, smoke-test 검증 규칙과 2026-07-11~12 진행 상황을 기록한다.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Possibly related issues

  • sungjunlee/dev-backlog#289 — 동일한 멀티 트랙 모델과 scope partitioning 및 바이트 호환성 계획을 다룬다.
  • sungjunlee/dev-relay#954sprint-close-report.js와 싱글턴 해석 패턴의 연계를 다룬다.
  • sungjunlee/dev-backlog#293 — Batch 3의 scope 분리 및 scopesOverlap() 작업과 직접 연결된다.

Poem

깡충깡충 토끼가 계획을 펼쳐,
여러 트랙이 나란히 달려요.
겹침은 쏙, 범위는 또렷,
단일 트랙은 그대로 반짝.
배치마다 당근 도장 쾅!

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/readd-multitrack-sprint

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: eb909a56ae

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".


## Running Context
- Design + decisions frozen in `docs/prd-2026-07-multi-track-sprints.md` (§9 D1–D4 resolved).
- The singleton is a durable capability contract, not just SKILL prose: `spec/capabilities.md:28` (sprint-execution invariant), `:69` (backlog-sync/sprint-mirror), `:7` (component single-slug). Amendment is human-gated via spec-grill → tracked as #294, which gates the SKILL/process prose flip in #295.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Fix capability anchors before routing the spec amendment

When the #294 spec amendment is picked up from this active sprint, these anchors send the reader to the wrong contracts in the current tree: spec/capabilities.md:28 is in tracker-task-truth, while the sprint-execution singleton is at line 69, and :69 is not the backlog-sync/sprint-mirror contract, which is at line 111. Since this line is the handoff for a human-gated amendment, please update the anchors or remove the brittle line numbers so the spec pass edits the intended blocks.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant