feat: prove github and local tracker cycles end to end (#278)#303
Conversation
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 52 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughGitHub 미러와 local canonical task store를 설정으로 선택하는 듀얼 트래커 계약을 문서화하고, 어댑터 capability 오류 처리와 GitHub/local 전체 사이클 수용 테스트를 추가했다. Changes트래커 계약 및 워크플로
런타임 라우팅
듀얼 모드 수용 증명
설계 및 시스템 증거
Estimated code review effort: 4 (Complex) | ~45 minutes Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Operator
participant CLI
participant TrackerAdapter
participant GitHubOrLocalStore
participant SprintFiles
Operator->>CLI: create / plan / work / complete
CLI->>TrackerAdapter: resolve configured tracker
TrackerAdapter->>GitHubOrLocalStore: create, read, update, close
GitHubOrLocalStore-->>TrackerAdapter: normalized task ref and state
TrackerAdapter->>SprintFiles: update Plan, Progress, and completion state
SprintFiles-->>Operator: sprint status and next work
Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@skills/dev-backlog/references/file-format.md`:
- Around line 55-57: Update the fenced code block containing the filename format
`{PREFIX}-{N[.M]} - {Title-Slug}.md` to specify a text language identifier, such
as text, eliminating the markdownlint MD040 warning.
In `@skills/dev-backlog/scripts/tracker-cycle.acceptance.test.js`:
- Line 364: Update the progress body assertion and mirror body pattern in the
acceptance test to derive the sprint filename slug dynamically from
init.sprintFile instead of hardcoding 2026-07-cycle.md or sprint=2026-07-cycle.
Preserve the existing assertion and matching behavior while using the
runtime-generated sprint value in both locations.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: d605a811-a22c-44aa-b5fe-0bb4dcec85ce
📒 Files selected for processing (19)
README.mddocs/tracker-adapter-design.mdskills/dev-backlog/SKILL.mdskills/dev-backlog/references/file-format.mdskills/dev-backlog/references/integration-contract.mdskills/dev-backlog/references/process.mdskills/dev-backlog/references/scripts.mdskills/dev-backlog/scripts/github-capabilities.test.jsskills/dev-backlog/scripts/progress-sync.jsskills/dev-backlog/scripts/sprint-init.jsskills/dev-backlog/scripts/sprint-mirror.jsskills/dev-backlog/scripts/status.shskills/dev-backlog/scripts/tracker-capability.jsskills/dev-backlog/scripts/tracker-cycle.acceptance.test.jsskills/dev-backlog/scripts/tracker-status-list.jsskills/dev-backlog/scripts/tracker.jsskills/dev-backlog/scripts/tracker.test.jsspec/capabilities.mdspec/system-map.md
1 participant
Summary
Verification
node --test skills/*/scripts/*.test.js— 652 passed, 1 pre-existing opt-in skipbash skills/dev-backlog/scripts/smoke-test.sh— 157/157 passedNPM_CONFIG_CACHE=/tmp/dev-backlog-npm-cache npx --yes skills add . -lfound exactly 2 skillsgit diff --checkpassedReview assurance note
The retained relay run preserves the hardened advisory attempts. OpenCode timed out on the large review payload, Cline did not emit its required structured result event, and the authenticated Pi/OpenCode-Go route returned its weekly usage-limit response. These provider failures made no source changes. Publication proceeds under operator recovery with the independent code review and the full deterministic gate set above; GitHub CI and unresolved-thread checks remain mandatory before merge.
Closes #278
Summary by CodeRabbit