-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
Pass --build to every docker compose run in AGENTS.md #1196
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ThisIsMissEm
wants to merge
1
commit into
main
Choose a base branch
from
emelia/agents-docker-compose-build
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Arguably this should be kept the same, though it is weird to build development tools into a baked docker image..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking about this as I was looking at the pr. And the
--buildis only needed because the compose services useCOPYinstead of volume mounts.For local dev, mounting the source directories would keep the container in sync without rebuilding. That avoids the
--buildtax entirely and makes the feedback loop faster. I think we can updatedocker-compose.yamlto mount./serverand./clientinto the respective services instead?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if that'd actually help here, due to how volume mounts end up working with the node_modules directories and with
.dockerignore— really I don't think we should be running lint, build, or test within the container typically in developer workflows: we already have those tools all existing locally vianpm install— with a volume mount we'd end up with macos deps running inside a linux container which would obviously break.The chances of drift here between the CI and local copy is next to none, bar maybe platform specific issues, since the only additional software in the container is dumb-init. Platform specific issues would be things we'd need to get fixed anyway in order to make the project contributor friendly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I understand the concern now. Mounting
./serverover/appwould overlay the image’s existing/app, including its Linux-installednode_modules. We could preserve those with a separate/app/node_modulesvolume or narrower source mounts, but that requires additional Compose design.I don’t think
.dockerignoreaffects runtime bind mounts. It only controls the Docker build context. Either way, with the current setup the source is baked into the images, so adding--buildmakes sense.