Skip to content

wirer: prefer MW-FEM readout analog port pairings (out1+in2, out8+in1) - #344

Open
KevinAVR wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
feat/new-in-out-mw-fem
Open

wirer: prefer MW-FEM readout analog port pairings (out1+in2, out8+in1)#344
KevinAVR wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
feat/new-in-out-mw-fem

Conversation

@KevinAVR

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • For RF wiring specs with INPUT_AND_OUTPUT (readout), try MW-FEM analog out1 + in2, then out8 + in1, before the unconstrained MW-FEM allocation path.
  • Output-only RF lines are unchanged.
  • Wirer tests updated for the new defaults; added tests for preferred pairing, second pairing after exhaustion, and drive-line behavior.

Test plan

  • python -m pytest tests/wirer/ -v

Made with Cursor

For INPUT_AND_OUTPUT wiring specs, try MW-FEM out1+in2 then out8+in1 before the generic MW-FEM spec. Output-only allocations are unchanged. Update existing wirer tests and add coverage for the new defaults.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented May 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Unit Test Results

0 tests   0 ✔️  0s ⏱️
0 suites  0 💤
0 files    0

Results for commit f0c3283.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@KevinAVR
KevinAVR requested a review from deanpoulos May 15, 2026 17:53
@KevinAVR

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@TheoLaudatQM @deanpoulos this PR intention is to default the MW-FEM readout wiring to be AO1-AI2 and AO8-AI1 based on our qua-docs recommendation.

@TheoLaudatQM
TheoLaudatQM requested a review from OziEgri May 18, 2026 08:01
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@KevinAVR

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@deanpoulos and @OziEgri now tests are passing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant