[PULP-1693] Fix blocklist lookup for name-only entries#1399
Open
jobselko wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
jobselko
force-pushed
the
1391_followup
branch
2 times, most recently
from
14ac390 to
ee29a4e
Compare
mdellweg
reviewed
May 20, 2026
| Show a blocklist entry. | ||
| """ | ||
| assert isinstance(entity_ctx, PulpPythonBlocklistEntryContext) | ||
| lookup = _blocklist_lookup(name, version, filename) |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks like you might want to use the generic.option_group.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As discussed, not sure if this can help me
follow-up to pulp#1391 Assisted By: Claude Opus 4.6
follow-up to pulp#1391
Member
Author
|
The failing CI test is unrelated - the nightly image was built before pulp_python 3.30.2 was released |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
follow-up to #1391