Skip to content

🚨 [security] Update all of sentry 8.4.0 → 10.56.0 (major)#650

Open
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
devfrom
depfu/update/yarn/group/sentry-10.56.0
Open

🚨 [security] Update all of sentry 8.4.0 → 10.56.0 (major)#650
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
devfrom
depfu/update/yarn/group/sentry-10.56.0

Conversation

@depfu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@depfu depfu Bot commented Jun 4, 2026

🚨 Your current dependencies have known security vulnerabilities 🚨

This dependency update fixes known security vulnerabilities. Please see the details below and assess their impact carefully. We recommend to merge and deploy this as soon as possible!

Here is everything you need to know about this upgrade. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ @​sentry/browser (8.4.0 → 10.56.0) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Sentry SDK Prototype Pollution gadget in JavaScript SDKs

Impact

In case a Prototype Pollution vulnerability is present in a user's application or bundled libraries, the Sentry SDK could potentially serve as a gadget to exploit that vulnerability. The exploitability depends on the specific details of the underlying Prototype Pollution issue.

Note

This advisory does not indicate the presence of a Prototype Pollution within the Sentry SDK itself. Users are strongly advised to first address any Prototype Pollution vulnerabilities in their application, as they pose a more critical security risk.

Patches

The issue was patched in all Sentry JavaScript SDKs starting from the 8.33.0 version.
Also, the fix was backported to SDK v7 in 7.119.1.

References

Release Notes

Too many releases to show here. View the full release notes.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 39 commits:

✳️ @​sentry/node (8.4.0 → 10.56.0) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Sentry's sensitive headers are leaked when `sendDefaultPii` is set to `true`

Impact

In version 10.11.0, a change to how the SDK collects request data in Node.js applications caused certain incoming HTTP headers to be added as trace span attributes. When sendDefaultPii: true was set, a few headers that were previously redacted - including Authorization and Cookie - were unintentionally allowed through.

Sentry’s server-side scrubbing (handled by Sentry's Relay edge proxy) normally serves as a second layer of protection. However, because it relied on the same matching logic as the SDK, it also failed to catch these headers in this case.

Users may be impacted if:

  1. Their Sentry SDK configuration has sendDefaultPii set to true
  2. Their application uses one of the Node.js Sentry SDKs with version from 10.11.0 to 10.26.0 inclusively:
  • @sentry/astro
  • @sentry/aws-serverless
  • @sentry/bun
  • @sentry/google-cloud-serverless
  • @sentry/nestjs
  • @sentry/nextjs
  • @sentry/node
  • @sentry/node-core
  • @sentry/nuxt
  • @sentry/remix
  • @sentry/solidstart
  • @sentry/sveltekit

Users can check if their project was affected, by visiting Explore → Traces and searching for “http.request.header.authorization”, “http.request.header.cookie” or similar. Any potentially sensitive values will be specific to users' applications and configurations.

Patches

The issue has been patched in all Sentry JavaScript SDKs starting from the 10.27.0 version.

Workarounds

Sentry strongly encourage customers to upgrade the SDK to the latest available version, 10.27.0 or later.
If it is not possible, consider setting sendDefaultPii: false to avoid unintentionally sending sensitive headers. See here for documentation.

Resources

🚨 Potential DoS when using ContextLines integration

Impact

The ContextLines integration uses readable streams to more efficiently use memory when reading files. The ContextLines integration is used to attach source context to outgoing events.

The stream was not explicitly closed after use. This could lead to excessive amounts of file handles open on the system and potentially lead to a Denial of Service (DoS).

The ContextLines integration is enabled by default in the Node SDK (@sentry/node) and SDKs that run in Node.js environments (@sentry/astro, @sentry/aws-serverless, @sentry/bun, @sentry/google-cloud-serverless, @sentry/nestjs, @sentry/nextjs, @sentry/nuxt, @sentry/remix, @sentry/solidstart, @sentry/sveltekit).

Patches

Users should upgrade to version 8.49.0 or higher.

Workarounds

To remediate this issue in affected versions without upgrading to version 8.49.0 and above you can disable the ContextLines integration. See the docs for more details.

Sentry.init({
  // ...
  integrations: function (integrations) {
    // integrations will be all default integrations
    return integrations.filter(function (integration) {
      return integration.name !== "ContextLines";
    });
  },
});

If you disable the ContextLines integration, you will lose source context on your error events.

References

Release Notes

Too many releases to show here. View the full release notes.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 39 commits:

Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu cancel merge
Cancels automatic merging of this PR
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu Bot added the depfu label Jun 4, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot requested a review from Maelstromeous June 4, 2026 14:10
@depfu depfu Bot mentioned this pull request Jun 4, 2026
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Maelstromeous Maelstromeous Awaiting requested review from Maelstromeous

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

depfu

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants