Hi — following up on #4292 (closed not_planned).
I'm a vetted contributor: my two compatibility scrapers completed a full review round with @michaeljguarino before the vouch gate went live (closed in the 2026-09-09 queue cleanup, all feedback addressed):
Since that request I've scoped 3 more ready-to-build scrapers from the open matrix bounties:
Each is a self-contained, review-ready PR (scraper + static/compatibilities/<app>.yaml + manifest line + unit tests) matching the already-merged conventions (product-org avatar icon, 3 latest minor kube versions, release-tag driven, fail-closed when floor > latest). I can deliver one per calendar month per the award rule, starting with whichever app is most valuable to the matrix.
Could a maintainer with write access comment !vouch @zhangb06 so I can resubmit from the existing branches? Both code branches are complete and conflict-free. Thanks for considering.
Hi — following up on #4292 (closed not_planned).
I'm a vetted contributor: my two compatibility scrapers completed a full review round with @michaeljguarino before the vouch gate went live (closed in the 2026-09-09 queue cleanup, all feedback addressed):
Since that request I've scoped 3 more ready-to-build scrapers from the open matrix bounties:
Each is a self-contained, review-ready PR (scraper +
static/compatibilities/<app>.yaml+ manifest line + unit tests) matching the already-merged conventions (product-org avatar icon, 3 latest minor kube versions, release-tag driven, fail-closed when floor > latest). I can deliver one per calendar month per the award rule, starting with whichever app is most valuable to the matrix.Could a maintainer with write access comment
!vouch @zhangb06so I can resubmit from the existing branches? Both code branches are complete and conflict-free. Thanks for considering.