docs: add checkpoint restore warning#23201
Conversation
|
Note Gemini is unable to generate a review for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported. |
Synced from: pingcap/docs-cn#21711 Target PR: pingcap#23201 AI Provider: azure Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Auto-sync completed successfully Source PR: pingcap/docs-cn#21711 English documentation has been updated based on Chinese documentation changes. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds a warning section to the br-checkpoint-restore.md documentation, detailing the risks of deleting a table during an active restore and retrying from a checkpoint starting from v8.5.5. It outlines potential issues, such as checksum failures and data loss, and provides instructions on how to properly abandon the restore. The reviewer suggested refining the warning block to improve clarity, eliminate repetitive phrasing, and adhere to the style guide by using active voice and the second person.
Important
The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
First-time contributors' checklist
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
Add a warning for checkpoint restore after DROP TABLE, covering checksum failure or possible later data loss, and link to the related issue.
Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?