Skip to content

0.70.2 P0: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-UD-IQ4_XS.gguf capability_match: no CUDA forward for qwen35moe (known failure in 0.70.1) #4665

Closed as not planned

Description

@noahgift

Known failure shipped in 0.70.1 (aprender 0.70.1, candidate cc4463f) under C272 5b; P0 for 0.70.2. Not a regression: it fails the same way on v0.69.5-rc.1 (5660b08).

  • Model: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-UD-IQ4_XS.gguf
  • Host(s): lambda
  • Check: capability_match
  • 0.70.1 result: FAIL: this build has no CUDA forward for architecture 'qwen35moe' (named refusal)
  • v0.69.5-rc.1 result: FAIL: identical refusal
  • Logs: 0.70.1: /mnt/nvme-raid0/tmp/evid-0701b/lambda-ladder.log; rc.1: /mnt/nvme-raid0/tmp/screen-0701/logs/inv_Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-UD-IQ4_XS.gguf.log
  • Reproduce: scripts/model_ladder.sh --host <lambda|gx10> --only inv:Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-UD-IQ4_XS.gguf

Done when: the ladder row is OK on lambda and gx10.

Activity

  1. added
    bugSomething isn't working
    P0Critical priority
    on Oct 3, 2026
  2. added 5 commits that reference this issue on Oct 4, 2026
  3. noahgift commented on Oct 5, 2026

    @noahgift
    ContributorAuthor

    Re-measure on current main (aprender-w4578): this is a named refusal for a missing architecture, not a GPU fallback. Proposed re-rule: refused-by-name, out of 0.70.2.

    • Binary: apr 0.70.1 (6192aa9b88), which is main at 6192aa9. Release build with --features cuda, sha256 prefix d8208cdfc6d3686a, run under the GPU lock.
    • GPU: RTX 4090.
    • Command: apr run Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-UD-IQ4_XS.gguf --prompt "What is 2+2? Answer with one number." --max-tokens 16 --trace gave rc=8:
    error: Inference failed: Format error: Architecture 'qwen35moe' uses SSM/Gated Delta Net layers (detected tensor 'blk.0.ssm_a'). There is no CPU or GPU forward for architecture 'qwen35moe' with SSM tensors. Tracking issues: #3090 (GPU) and #3091 (CPU) — both implement the Qwen3.5 hybrid ('qwen35'), not this architecture.
    
    • The same refusal (rc=8) comes with --no-gpu. The load is refused before any backend is chosen, so there is no CUDA path that falls back here.
    • The wording has changed since 0.70.1 ("no CUDA forward") to "no CPU or GPU forward", which is accurate: neither forward exists.

    Proposal: re-rule.
    The refusal names the file's architecture, gives a clear error, and is deterministic. That is the "refuse the file by name" outcome #4664's ruling allows. Making the row OK needs a new qwen35moe forward, meaning MoE routing plus the Gated Delta Net layers on both CPU and GPU. That is an architecture feature, not a 0.70.2 P0 bug fix.

    The proposed re-rule:

    1. Mark the ladder row as a named refusal (red_model) rather than a P0 failure.
    2. Track the qwen35moe forward as a feature ticket.
    3. Take it out of the 0.70.2 P0 set.

    Agent: aprender-w4578

  4. noahgift commented on Oct 5, 2026

    @noahgift
    ContributorAuthor

    Re-ruled (release cop, 2026-10-05): refused-by-name for 0.70.2.

    On main, apr run --gpu on this file exits 12 with the by-name refusal: "this build has no CUDA forward for architecture 'qwen35moe' ... This is a refusal, not a fallback". That is exactly what the existing red_unsupported["Qwen3.5-35B-A3B*.gguf"] key requires, so the ladder row reads RED-UNSUPPORTED rather than FAIL.

    Agent: aprender-w4578

  5. added this to the 0.71.0 milestone on Oct 7, 2026
  6. noahgift commented on Oct 7, 2026

    @noahgift
    ContributorAuthor

    0.70.2 ships on a CRUX-smoke emergency scope (operator ruling C322, A1 and A2). This issue is refused for 0.70.2 and moves to milestone 0.71.0, with no per-issue contract edit. The 0.70.2 release notes name it as a known failure.

  7. noahgift commented on Oct 14, 2026

    @noahgift
    ContributorAuthor

    Folded into #5311 as a checklist row (TRIAGE-100, 2026-10-14): the open-ticket cap is 100, so this ticket is now tracked on that master and closed as not planned. Nothing is lost: reopen it when its work resumes, and an open PR for it reopens it. Pushed branch: fix/4665-qwen35moe-forward.

    Agent: aprender-clerk

  8. noahgift commented on Oct 14, 2026

    @noahgift
    ContributorAuthor

    Row moved: #5311 was split into named masters (TRIAGE-100 master naming), so this ticket's checklist row is now on #5327.

    Agent: aprender-clerk

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions