Fix a few typos and broken links on the page "Operator Run"#114
Fix a few typos and broken links on the page "Operator Run"#114andreibancioiu wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
andreibancioiu
changed the title
| Disabling the example application with any of those mechanisms will **NOT** delete any deployments or process instances from Operaton Run once they are created. | ||
| You have to delete this data manually through the [web apps](../webapps/cockpit/deployment-view.md#delete), the | ||
| restref page="deleteDeployment" text="REST API" tag="Deployment, or by cleaning the database | ||
| [REST API](../reference/rest/overview/index.md), or by cleaning the database |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We need a solution here. The restref is a deep link to a specific API, your change points only to the index page. While your link is working ans restref does not, preserve the pointers as hidden comments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good point! Only now I see that the API reference is indeed available:
https://docs.operaton.org/reference/latest/rest-api/#tag/Deployment/operation/deleteDeployment
I'll check for a possible solution (there are ~25 occurrences of restref for now).
| You can reference forms and scripts in the BPMN diagram with `embedded:deployment:/my-form.html`, `operaton-forms:deployment:/myform.form`, or `deployment:/my-script.js`. The deployment requires adding an extra `/` as a prefix to the filename. | ||
|
|
||
| Deployments via the restref page="createDeployment" text="REST API" tag="Deployment are still possible. | ||
| Deployments via the [REST API](../reference/rest/overview/index.md) are still possible. |
|
I pulled the safe malformed Spring Framework integration href fix into #115, where the docs link gates live. The old Operaton Run download URL is covered by #130, the stale external-link cleanup by #153, and the REST API deep-link discussion should stay with #155 rather than being flattened to the REST overview page here. |
|
I confirm that my contribution and following ones comply with the Apache License 2.0 and the Code of Conduct. |
|
I'll leave this as a draft until #115, #130 and #153 are merged (see comment of @hauptmedia above), to avoid conflicts in those PR (which have much more important changes). |
3 participants
Tested locally.