Fix for OCPBUGS-90525 OCPBUGS-90526: CVE-2026-12151 CVE-2026-9697

[germanparente]

Summary

• Bumps undici from 7.25.0 to 7.28.0 to fix CVE-2026-12151
• CVE-2026-12151 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) WebSocket denial-of-service vulnerability where a malicious server can cause unbounded memory growth via excessive message fragments
• The fix updates web/package-lock.json only — no package.json change needed since ^7.19.0 already covers 7.28.0

Test plan

• Verify undici resolves to >= 7.28.0 in the lockfile
• Run existing test suite to confirm no regressions

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[openshift-ci-robot]

@germanparente: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-90525, which is invalid:

• expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-90525 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.18.0, 4.18.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-90526, which is invalid:

• expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-90526 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.18.0, 4.18.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Summary

• Bumps undici from 7.25.0 to 7.28.0 to fix CVE-2026-12151
• CVE-2026-12151 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) WebSocket denial-of-service vulnerability where a malicious server can cause unbounded memory growth via excessive message fragments
• The fix updates web/package-lock.json only — no package.json change needed since ^7.19.0 already covers 7.28.0

Test plan

• Verify undici resolves to >= 7.28.0 in the lockfile
• Run existing test suite to confirm no regressions

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: germanparente
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign peteryurkovich for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[germanparente]

this CVE's are not applicable in 4.18 branch:

/label jira/skip-dependent-bug-check

[germanparente]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@germanparente: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-90525, which is invalid:

• expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-90525 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.18.0, 4.18.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-90526, which is invalid:

• expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-90526 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.18.0, 4.18.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@germanparente: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-90525, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

4 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.17.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.z)
• bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
• release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (ocp-sustaining-admins@redhat.com), skipping review request.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-90526, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

4 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.17.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.z)
• bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
• release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (ocp-sustaining-admins@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

Summary

• Bumps undici from 7.25.0 to 7.28.0 to fix CVE-2026-12151
• CVE-2026-12151 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) WebSocket denial-of-service vulnerability where a malicious server can cause unbounded memory growth via excessive message fragments
• The fix updates web/package-lock.json only — no package.json change needed since ^7.19.0 already covers 7.28.0

Test plan

• Verify undici resolves to >= 7.28.0 in the lockfile
• Run existing test suite to confirm no regressions

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 2fe6adf6-1d63-42e1-b344-8be6a5eb3c42

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[openshift-ci]

@germanparente: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.