Skip to content

docs/install: include the scheduler chapter dynamically - #2653

Closed
viniciusferrao wants to merge 1 commit into
openhpc:4.xfrom
VersatusHPC:docs-scheduler-generic
Closed

docs/install: include the scheduler chapter dynamically#2653
viniciusferrao wants to merge 1 commit into
openhpc:4.xfrom
VersatusHPC:docs-scheduler-generic

Conversation

@viniciusferrao

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Use the same dynamic include idiom as the provisioner chapters so new schedulers only need config + templates.

Sponsored-by: VersatusHPC

Use the same dynamic include idiom as the provisioner chapters so new schedulers (e.g. OpenPBS) only need config + templates. Rendered content unchanged.

Signed-off-by: Vinícius Ferrão <ferrao@versatushpc.com.br>
Sponsored-by: VersatusHPC
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚀 CCache Statistics

Configuration 🐧 RHEL 🦊 openEuler
🖥️ x86_64 / gnu15 🟡 26.11% 🟡 24.53%
🖥️ x86_64 / intel 🟡 27.27% -
💪 aarch64 / gnu15 🔴 17.39% 🔴 16.14%
📊 Detailed Statistics

openEuler (aarch64)

Cacheable calls:    5383 / 9791 (54.98%)
  Hits:              869 / 5383 (16.14%)
    Direct:          450 /  869 (51.78%)
    Preprocessed:    419 /  869 (48.22%)
  Misses:           4514 / 5383 (83.86%)
Uncacheable calls:  4408 / 9791 (45.02%)
Local storage:
  Cache size (GiB):  0.4 /  5.0 ( 7.58%)
  Hits:              869 / 5383 (16.14%)
  Misses:           4514 / 5383 (83.86%)

openEuler (x86_64)

Cacheable calls:    6483 / 11998 (54.03%)
  Hits:             1590 /  6483 (24.53%)
    Direct:          754 /  1590 (47.42%)
    Preprocessed:    836 /  1590 (52.58%)
  Misses:           4893 /  6483 (75.47%)
Uncacheable calls:  5515 / 11998 (45.97%)
Local storage:
  Cache size (GiB):  0.4 /   5.0 ( 8.24%)
  Hits:             1590 /  6483 (24.53%)
  Misses:           4893 /  6483 (75.47%)

RHEL (aarch64/gnu15)

Cacheable calls:    5198 / 9427 (55.14%)
  Hits:              904 / 5198 (17.39%)
    Direct:          484 /  904 (53.54%)
    Preprocessed:    420 /  904 (46.46%)
  Misses:           4294 / 5198 (82.61%)
Uncacheable calls:  4229 / 9427 (44.86%)
Local storage:
  Cache size (GiB):  0.4 /  5.0 ( 7.54%)
  Hits:              904 / 5198 (17.39%)
  Misses:           4294 / 5198 (82.61%)

RHEL (x86_64/gnu15)

Cacheable calls:    6315 / 11659 (54.16%)
  Hits:             1649 /  6315 (26.11%)
    Direct:          812 /  1649 (49.24%)
    Preprocessed:    837 /  1649 (50.76%)
  Misses:           4666 /  6315 (73.89%)
Uncacheable calls:  5344 / 11659 (45.84%)
Local storage:
  Cache size (GiB):  0.4 /   5.0 ( 8.20%)
  Hits:             1649 /  6315 (26.11%)
  Misses:           4666 /  6315 (73.89%)

RHEL (x86_64/intel)

Cacheable calls:     6476 / 17223 (37.60%)
  Hits:              1766 /  6476 (27.27%)
    Direct:           816 /  1766 (46.21%)
    Preprocessed:     950 /  1766 (53.79%)
  Misses:            4710 /  6476 (72.73%)
Uncacheable calls:  10747 / 17223 (62.40%)
Local storage:
  Cache size (GiB):   0.4 /   5.0 ( 7.02%)
  Hits:              1766 /  6476 (27.27%)
  Misses:            4710 /  6476 (72.73%)

🤖 Generated from workflow run 29170603592

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test Results

 29 files  ±0  29 suites  ±0   46s ⏱️ -6s
 59 tests ±0  53 ✅ ±0  6 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
105 runs  ±0  97 ✅ ±0  8 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit b77c665. ± Comparison against base commit 30a27e1.

@middelkoopt middelkoopt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please integrate this into a single PR (#2654).

@viniciusferrao

viniciusferrao commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The idea was to keep it easy to be cherrypicked and @adrianreber usually asks. But that's fine. I'll add to the one you mentioned.

Are you sure @middelkoopt because this change isn't only affecting xCAT. It will affect the other provisioners.

@middelkoopt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I will need to test all the provisioners and would rather do it all at once, but please keep it as a single commit.

@viniciusferrao

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Superseeded by #2654

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants