You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Filing-gate category: ④ in-scope child of #30289 (the scenario-library card schema). It is split out because the ruled scope measured over the 3000-line human-merge threshold: dev report comment 6658595859, seat decision on #30289. Maintainer rulings it carries are on objectstack-ai/cloud#3600: Q1 = v3 (comment 6658194654, 「同意这9个场景」), plus the execution parameter and declarative floor (comment 6658499884).
Scope: one mid-tier scenario card, 资产全生命周期 asset lifecycle (admin)
Write docs/qa/scenarios/asset-lifecycle.json against the schema #30340 lands, plus its own truth-pin test file under packages/qa/scenarios/test/. A test file per card keeps the six card PRs from conflicting.
Domain: asset, category, checkout, return, repair, a scrap approval, depreciation.
Mid-tier floor:
5–8 related objects;
≥1 approval or automation flow;
2–3 roles with row scope;
≥1 report or dashboard;
seed spanning ≥3 months, ≥100 rows on the main object;
declarative preferred (flows, formulas, validation rules over code hooks), so a graduated app can install unmanaged.
Run half:
8–10 read-only 问数 questions: count/sum, group-by, top-N, a time window, ≥2 cross-object, ≥2 permission-boundary (the truth differs per persona), "who owns / latest progress", ≥1 unanswerable-from-seed;
4–6 write operations, each with its expected outcome declared: entry from free text incl. lines, a modify, a workflow step + progress query, a confirm-gated irreversible action, a refused overstep, a refused validation violation, one multi-step chain;
≥3 agent-callable actions declared, ≥1 of them confirm-gated.
Iterate: one sentence, with its expected delta.
Reference: none in the templates repo; general business knowledge.
⛔ No customer-derived content; ⛔ do not read or paraphrase objectstack-ai/cloud#3567.
Acceptance
The card loads with zero refusals. Every computed truth is asserted in the card's own test file against hand-worked values.
A deliberately wrong truth in a fixture copy goes red.
The PR stays under 3000 changed lines.
Reader: the epic PM of objectstack-ai/cloud#3600 dispatches it once PR #30340 merges. The six siblings are dispatched in parallel.
Re-graded p2 → p1 and handed to the domain:devx lane on a maintainer ruling (Claude Code session 2026-11-05, recorded on objectstack-ai/cloud#3600), verbatim: 「都可以标记高优先级」, then on the seat's follow-up question the option 「p1 + 只交 6 张卡 (推荐)」. pm:epic removed in this stroke; pm:blocked stays on Blocked-by: #30340. When PR #30340 merges, the devx lane seat dispatches this card from pm:queue, overriding this body's "Reader" line. The card's body, and the rulings it cites, are the spec. Note for triage: this is a direct maintainer re-grade; NORTH-STAR's road-table rule yields to the ruling.
Unblocked: Blocked-by: #30340 has merged (58085ffd), so pm:blocked → pm:queue in one transition. This card is the domain:devx lane's to claim and dispatch (p1). The schema it writes against is on main: packages/qa/scenarios/src/schema.ts; worked examples are the three control cards in docs/qa/scenarios/.
Claim: PM loop round 1 · 2026-11-05T21:27Z
Session: session_016WV4cz3RTQjLh7hZBLzgtZ (devx seat 3) · dev: session_016WV4czx7zatyA1s7R4yPhB (card thread)
Account: os-elon-musk
Branch: claude/project-thread-m0naih (amended: the card thread's branch)
Worktree: card thread container
Domain: domain:devx
Seat: domain:devx#3
File surface: docs/qa/scenarios/asset_lifecycle.json · packages/qa/scenarios/test/asset-lifecycle.test.ts (narrowed by the dev: #30600 left library.test.ts and the README card-agnostic) (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model: M, mode:thread, model: TIER_DEFAULT (dispatch-gates --tier: no path-derived mandate, per-card call), effort: xhigh (p1)
Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card
Thread-read: 6662269345
Premise: holds (Blocked-by #30340 merged as 58085ff; sibling #30476 landed as PR #30600b6ae87c, the worked example)
Serial constraints cleared: the five sibling cards #30477–#30481 each write their own card file and test file; the shared line is packages/qa/scenarios/test/library.test.ts (one registration line per card), so each PR merges main after a sibling lands. No other in-flight claim touches packages/qa/scenarios/ or docs/qa/scenarios/.
{
"issue": 30481,
"status": "done",
"branch": "claude/project-thread-m0naih",
"pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/30695",
"session": "session_016WV4czx7zatyA1s7R4yPhB",
"premise_still_valid": true,
"summary": "Added docs/qa/scenarios/asset_lifecycle.json, the asset-lifecycle mid-tier card: 8 objects (department, employee, asset_category, asset, checkout, repair_order, disposal_request, depreciation_entry), 120 assets bought 2026-06..09, a scrap approval routed to the asset department manager, monthly straight-line depreciation, 3 personas (employee and dept_manager row-scoped), 10 questions, 6 operations, 6 agent actions (dispose_asset confirm-gated). Its own test file packages/qa/scenarios/test/asset-lifecycle.test.ts pins all 10 truths and 10 per-persona truths against hand-worked values, checks seed consistency and operation targets, and shows a wrong seed cell and a wrong truth spec in fixture copies go red. The file surface came out smaller than the claim: library.test.ts and the README are untouched (since PR 30600 they name only the control cards), so no sibling conflict is possible. Card file is snake_case asset_lifecycle.json (id must equal basename), as PR 30600 did.",
"tests": "head 0ffa47e2a6 (after merging main b77c160a and a whole-tree pnpm build, 118/118 turbo tasks): pnpm --filter @objectstack/scenarios test -> Test Files 5 passed (5), Tests 70 passed (70); pnpm --filter @objectstack/scenarios typecheck -> tsc --noEmit exit 0 (os-verify-lock VERDICT command-exit 0); tsc --listFiles lists asset-lifecycle.test.ts. Same results at 11193506 before the merge. eslint --no-inline-config on the new test file exit 0. Truths were worked independently by a Python script from the seed rule (no evaluator code) and agreed with the loader on first run. No ablation: the diff changes no tested behaviour (data plus its own pins); the fixture-copy tests are the declared red proof.",
"gates": "local: node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack derived 50 commands; all 50 exit 0 on head 0ffa47e2a6; --ran reconciliation: 50 derived, 50 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN (exit 0). First run at 11193506: 47 exit 0, 3 exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET (check-plugin-teardown-shape --self-test on a shallow clone, cleared by git fetch --unshallow origin main; check:lean-entry-closure and check:dual-build-cjs-loads, cleared by pnpm build). CI on PR 30695 at report time: Check Changeset success, Governed Surface Queue Guard success, Lint/Type Check/Test jobs in_progress. line_budget: 1294 changed lines (+1294/-0, 2 files) < 3000.",
"dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm",
"mcp_calls": "5 — GitHub MCP reads only: issue_read get + get_comments (30481), pull_request_read get (30600), pull_request_read get + get_check_runs (30695); plus claude-code-remote subscribe_pr_activity (30695, platform watch, not a GitHub write). No MCP write tool.",
"api_writes": "2 relay strokes as objectstack-fleet[bot]: pr_create (POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls draft + POST /issues/30695/labels skip-changeset; read-back 8733 bytes identical) and this os-dev-report comment (POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/30481/comments). git push x2 (not REST).",
"files_changed": [
"docs/qa/scenarios/asset_lifecycle.json",
"packages/qa/scenarios/test/asset-lifecycle.test.ts"
],
"deviations": "File surface narrower than claimed (no library.test.ts or README edit). Card basename asset_lifecycle.json instead of the issue spelling asset-lifecycle.json (schema requires snake_case id = basename). PR footer uses the AGENTS.md session-URL form, not the harness reminder form.",
"open_questions": [],
"security_findings": "none",
"out_of_scope_findings": []
}
Note for this card's author (domain:devx#1), from the epic PM's review of objectstack#30291 / PR #30594 (ruling D). The capability-tag table is closed: a tag with no check is reported unscored, never a pass. It now has 9 rows, listed in packages/qa/scenarios/README.md once PR #30594 merges:
The merged travel-expense card (#30476) declares 12 tags, and 7 of them score unscored: records-forms.formula-field, records-forms.validation-rule, approvals.multi-step-approval, access-security.row-level-security, dashboards.report, ai.ask-data, ai.agent-actions.
Where a tag means the same as a row, use the row's name (e.g. access-security.row-scope, not access-security.row-level-security). Where it genuinely doesn't, keep it: an unscored tag is honest. The epic collects the demand and files one card to add checks for the most-used unscored tags once the six cards land.
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
triage#1 · os-zhuang · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U
Path: none
Triage: audit · p2 ·
domain:devx· epic child · 2026-11-05T14:13Z⛔ Not a claim.
Blocked-by: #30340holds.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
epic:#3600#1 · hotlong · session_01Q4EjjPXwX1YfHyKJUh4agu
Re-graded p2 → p1 and handed to the
domain:devxlane on a maintainer ruling (Claude Code session 2026-11-05, recorded on objectstack-ai/cloud#3600), verbatim: 「都可以标记高优先级」, then on the seat's follow-up question the option 「p1 + 只交 6 张卡 (推荐)」.pm:epicremoved in this stroke;pm:blockedstays onBlocked-by: #30340. When PR #30340 merges, the devx lane seat dispatches this card frompm:queue, overriding this body's "Reader" line. The card's body, and the rulings it cites, are the spec. Note for triage: this is a direct maintainer re-grade; NORTH-STAR's road-table rule yields to the ruling.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
epic:#3600#1 · hotlong · session_01Q4EjjPXwX1YfHyKJUh4agu
Unblocked:
Blocked-by: #30340has merged (58085ffd), sopm:blocked→pm:queuein one transition. This card is thedomain:devxlane's to claim and dispatch (p1). The schema it writes against is onmain:packages/qa/scenarios/src/schema.ts; worked examples are the three control cards indocs/qa/scenarios/.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
domain:devx#3 · os-elon-musk · session_016WV4cz3RTQjLh7hZBLzgtZ
Claim: PM loop round 1 · 2026-11-05T21:27Z
Session:
session_016WV4cz3RTQjLh7hZBLzgtZ(devx seat 3) · dev:session_016WV4czx7zatyA1s7R4yPhB(card thread)Account:
os-elon-muskBranch:
claude/project-thread-m0naih(amended: the card thread's branch)Worktree: card thread container
Domain:
domain:devxSeat:
domain:devx#3File surface:
docs/qa/scenarios/asset_lifecycle.json·packages/qa/scenarios/test/asset-lifecycle.test.ts(narrowed by the dev: #30600 leftlibrary.test.tsand the README card-agnostic) (stop on breach; explain in the report)Container & model:
M,mode:thread,model: TIER_DEFAULT(dispatch-gates --tier: no path-derived mandate, per-card call),effort: xhigh(p1)Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card
Thread-read: 6662269345
Premise: holds (Blocked-by #30340 merged as 58085ff; sibling #30476 landed as PR #30600 b6ae87c, the worked example)
Serial constraints cleared: the five sibling cards #30477–#30481 each write their own card file and test file; the shared line is
packages/qa/scenarios/test/library.test.ts(one registration line per card), so each PR mergesmainafter a sibling lands. No other in-flight claim touchespackages/qa/scenarios/ordocs/qa/scenarios/.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
domain:devx#3 · os-elon-musk · session_016WV4czx7zatyA1s7R4yPhB
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 30481, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/project-thread-m0naih", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/30695", "session": "session_016WV4czx7zatyA1s7R4yPhB", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Added docs/qa/scenarios/asset_lifecycle.json, the asset-lifecycle mid-tier card: 8 objects (department, employee, asset_category, asset, checkout, repair_order, disposal_request, depreciation_entry), 120 assets bought 2026-06..09, a scrap approval routed to the asset department manager, monthly straight-line depreciation, 3 personas (employee and dept_manager row-scoped), 10 questions, 6 operations, 6 agent actions (dispose_asset confirm-gated). Its own test file packages/qa/scenarios/test/asset-lifecycle.test.ts pins all 10 truths and 10 per-persona truths against hand-worked values, checks seed consistency and operation targets, and shows a wrong seed cell and a wrong truth spec in fixture copies go red. The file surface came out smaller than the claim: library.test.ts and the README are untouched (since PR 30600 they name only the control cards), so no sibling conflict is possible. Card file is snake_case asset_lifecycle.json (id must equal basename), as PR 30600 did.", "tests": "head 0ffa47e2a6 (after merging main b77c160a and a whole-tree pnpm build, 118/118 turbo tasks): pnpm --filter @objectstack/scenarios test -> Test Files 5 passed (5), Tests 70 passed (70); pnpm --filter @objectstack/scenarios typecheck -> tsc --noEmit exit 0 (os-verify-lock VERDICT command-exit 0); tsc --listFiles lists asset-lifecycle.test.ts. Same results at 11193506 before the merge. eslint --no-inline-config on the new test file exit 0. Truths were worked independently by a Python script from the seed rule (no evaluator code) and agreed with the loader on first run. No ablation: the diff changes no tested behaviour (data plus its own pins); the fixture-copy tests are the declared red proof.", "gates": "local: node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack derived 50 commands; all 50 exit 0 on head 0ffa47e2a6; --ran reconciliation: 50 derived, 50 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN (exit 0). First run at 11193506: 47 exit 0, 3 exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET (check-plugin-teardown-shape --self-test on a shallow clone, cleared by git fetch --unshallow origin main; check:lean-entry-closure and check:dual-build-cjs-loads, cleared by pnpm build). CI on PR 30695 at report time: Check Changeset success, Governed Surface Queue Guard success, Lint/Type Check/Test jobs in_progress. line_budget: 1294 changed lines (+1294/-0, 2 files) < 3000.", "dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm", "mcp_calls": "5 — GitHub MCP reads only: issue_read get + get_comments (30481), pull_request_read get (30600), pull_request_read get + get_check_runs (30695); plus claude-code-remote subscribe_pr_activity (30695, platform watch, not a GitHub write). No MCP write tool.", "api_writes": "2 relay strokes as objectstack-fleet[bot]: pr_create (POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls draft + POST /issues/30695/labels skip-changeset; read-back 8733 bytes identical) and this os-dev-report comment (POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/30481/comments). git push x2 (not REST).", "files_changed": [ "docs/qa/scenarios/asset_lifecycle.json", "packages/qa/scenarios/test/asset-lifecycle.test.ts" ], "deviations": "File surface narrower than claimed (no library.test.ts or README edit). Card basename asset_lifecycle.json instead of the issue spelling asset-lifecycle.json (schema requires snake_case id = basename). PR footer uses the AGENTS.md session-URL form, not the harness reminder form.", "open_questions": [], "security_findings": "none", "out_of_scope_findings": [] }objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
domain:devx#3 · os-elon-musk · session_016WV4cz3RTQjLh7hZBLzgtZ
ACCEPT → PR #30695 comment 6671633351 (head
0ffa47e2a6, 2026-11-05T22:52Z). Waiting on the landing word.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
epic:#3600#1 · hotlong · session_01Q4EjjPXwX1YfHyKJUh4agu
Note for this card's author (
domain:devx#1), from the epic PM's review of objectstack#30291 / PR #30594 (ruling D). The capability-tag table is closed: a tag with no check is reportedunscored, never a pass. It now has 9 rows, listed inpackages/qa/scenarios/README.mdonce PR #30594 merges:records-forms.lookup,records-forms.master-detail-inline-edit,records-forms.roll-up-summary,records-forms.select-options,access-security.field-permissions,access-security.row-scope,approvals.approval-flow,automation.record-triggered-flow,dashboards.widget-measures.The merged travel-expense card (#30476) declares 12 tags, and 7 of them score
unscored:records-forms.formula-field,records-forms.validation-rule,approvals.multi-step-approval,access-security.row-level-security,dashboards.report,ai.ask-data,ai.agent-actions.Where a tag means the same as a row, use the row's name (e.g.
access-security.row-scope, notaccess-security.row-level-security). Where it genuinely doesn't, keep it: anunscoredtag is honest. The epic collects the demand and files one card to add checks for the most-used unscored tags once the six cards land.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 6, 2026
domain:devx#3 · os-elon-musk · session_016WV4cz3RTQjLh7hZBLzgtZ
Landed · 2026-11-06T05:08Z
9b24f3caonmainFixes #30481State:
pm:dispatchedremoved in this stroke. Delivered: the mid-tier scenario card and its own truth-pin test file. Nothing left on this card.