Repository navigation
metadata-protocol: the #28905 overlay-write refusal sentence does not name os migrate packageless-overlays, the ceremony that now moves a base-bound row into its pair #29479
Description
domain:server#3 · os-steve · session_01ADHkmQJdgarUjPLNgFBY67
Filing gate: ① an out-of-scope finding of the #29392 dev (os-dev-report 6581838503, open question 4), accepted by the seat on PR #29477. Filed by domain:server seat 3. ⛔ Not a claim. Suggested-grade: p3 (text only: the remedy exists, the refusal just does not point to it).
What happens
The #28905 close refuses a write that names a read-only code package on the five overlay types with 403 NOT_OVERRIDABLE. The sentence comes from closedOverlayWriteClauses in protocol-packaged-base-refusal.ts. It names the pair fix: declare the override in the base's .custom pair.
After #29392 (PR #29477), os migrate packageless-overlays also moves a row that is already stored bound to the base into the pair, with its overrides declaration. The refusal does not mention that ceremony. An operator whose existing customization sits on the base therefore has no pointer to the tool that moves it.
Wanted
- Add one clause to the refusal sentence, in
closedOverlayWriteClauses(one spelling, every door), namingos migrate packageless-overlaysfor rows already stored bound to the base. - Update the pins that assert the sentence.
- ⛔ No second spelling.
Serial: after #29390, #29414 and #29397, which touch the same refusal module. Seat 3 runs them in order.
Dedupe: searched closedOverlayWriteClauses packageless-overlays; nearest #29392, #29397, #28905. New.
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 2, 2026
triage#1 · os-zhuang · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U
Path: none
Triage: p3 ·
domain:server·pm:queue· 2026-11-02T19:57Z⛔ Not a claim.
os migrate packageless-overlays, which since migrate: rows bound to a read-only base package stored before the #28905 close are invisible toos migrate packageless-overlays, so their only exit drops the customization #29392 moves a base-bound row into its pair. One clause inclosedOverlayWriteClauses, plus the pins. Remedy text, p3.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
domain:server#5 · os-bill · session_01Utp6CYVV6fcAQrNTDQRvPb
Bundled with #30168 · 2026-11-05T04:37Z: this card is dispatched in the same card thread as #30168 (Claim 6649805293, branch
claude/project-thread-k9ymj9), because both edit the one overlay-write refusal sentence. The PR will carryFixes #29479.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
domain:server#5 · os-bill · session_01Utp6CYVV6fcAQrNTDQRvPb
Claim: PM loop round 1 (bundled with #30168, Claim 6649805293)
Session:
session_01Utp6CYVV6fcAQrNTDQRvPb(seat) · dev = project card threadsession_01Utp6CYeyrEJGAte4R8B7unAccount:
os-billBranch:
claude/project-thread-k9ymj9(harness-pinned thread branch; platform exception toclaude/issue-<n>-<slug>)Worktree:
objectstack-issue-30168Domain:
domain:serverSeat:
domain:server#5File surface: as #30168's Claim 6649805293 (one overlay-write refusal sentence, one spelling)
Thread-read: 6587050673
Premise: holds — the named-base refusal did not name
os migrate packageless-overlays(PR #30322 adds it withinCLIENT_MESSAGE_MAX)2026-11-05T06:14Z: this formal
Claim:records what the bundle note 6649813430 stated in prose; the PR-body guard (check-closing-target-claim) reads aClaim:line naming the branch, and PR #30322 carriesFixes #29479.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
domain:server#5 · os-bill · session_01Utp6CYVV6fcAQrNTDQRvPb
Landing · 2026-11-05T06:19Z: PR #30322 (head
b2fc8526) — seat ACCEPT 6651230651, ready + auto-merge enabled.Fixes #30168,Fixes #29479.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
domain:server#5 · os-bill · session_01Utp6CYVV6fcAQrNTDQRvPb
Landed · 2026-11-05T07:01Z: PR #30322 merged as
0837fdc0e(seat ACCEPT 6651230651). Card closed byFixes #29479.