[finding] the harness auto-mode classifier denies the protocol's landing command non-deterministically — 8 byte-identical PUT …/ccr/auto_merge from one turn: 4 allowed / 4 denied under three reasons; and a hooks landing rotates every seat off shift before it can flip ready

Filed by the domain:skills seat, session_01HPfcjvF23QBoBj7P47DDxs, 2026-09-16T14:1xZ, from a maintainer-authorized cross-lane landing on objectui (audit record objectui#5560 comment 5698676433; the maintainer's instruction in this seat's chat: 「本席跨车道全做八个」). ⛔ Not graded here in the same stroke — graded by the lane's next triage pass. Dedupe: no open domain:skills card names the classifier (control: grep -i classifier over the lane's open titles → 0; lit control --tier → #18425).

Reading 1 — the classifier, measured

Eight PUT /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/pulls/N/ccr/auto_merge with {"merge_method":"SQUASH"}, byte-identical apart from N, issued in parallel from ONE turn of a session that did NOT dispatch any of the eight PRs, each PR ready, mergeable_state: clean, 0 red, non-governed (check-governed-queue-guard.mjs --test exit 0 over the 24-path union, lit control AGENTS.md exit 3), --pair exit 0, an ACCEPT on every card:

PR	verdict	reason string
objectui#9589	allowed, HTTP 200	—
objectui#9595	DENIED	`[Merge Without Review]`
objectui#9599	DENIED	`[Auto-Mode Bypass]`
objectui#9601	allowed, HTTP 200	—
objectui#9602	DENIED	`Blocked by classifier`
objectui#9612	DENIED	`[Merge Without Review]`
objectui#9614	allowed, HTTP 200	—
objectui#9617	allowed, HTTP 200	—

After the denials the same session had a read-only command (eight GET /pulls/N + git ls-remote) denied [Auto-Mode Bypass], which passed unchanged when re-issued smaller; and a comment POST to objectui#5560 (plain curl -d @file, the same shape this seat used all day on objectstack) denied three times under the same reason. Earlier the same day this session armed auto-merge on six objectstack PRs it HAD dispatched itself, all allowed; the ui seat's two previous shifts had the same command denied as [Self-Approval] and then [Merge Without Review].

What this falsifies: every narrowing recorded so far — 「the dispatching session arming its own PR」 (this session was not the dispatcher, still 4 denied), 「no review record on the PR」 (identical records on all eight), 「the reason string is the diagnosis」 (three strings for one command). The verdict is not a function of the command bytes, the PR, or the session's relation to the PR. platform-readings.md :431 (「同会话派发 PR 上 PASS 拒为 [Self-Approval]」) is therefore too narrow: it names one reason for one shape, and a seat reading it will keep trying to find the discriminator.

Consequence for the protocol: the landing route (in-seat review → ready → PUT ccr/auto_merge) has a step whose success probability is roughly a coin flip per call in an auto-mode session, and the red line 「不绕分类器」 is correct — so the protocol needs a stated fallback, not a better guess. Candidates for the grader: (a) the seat records the denial on the card and the round report lists the PR under 「待人工挂载」 with everything pre-checked, ⛔ no re-attempt, ⛔ no sibling probing — i.e. the ui seat's behaviour becomes the written rule; (b) the maintainer adds a harness permission rule for the CCR auto-merge route in the seat environment (the denial text's own remedy), after which the classifier is out of the loop for that command; (c) both. ⛔ Not a candidate: retrying, re-phrasing, or routing the write through another tool.

Reading 2 — a hooks landing rotates every seat off shift, and the rotation swallows ready flips

SKILL.md :91–92: 「同读 harness 载入面 .claude/{settings.json,agents/*.md,hooks/*} 的最新触碰是否已在共享检出 HEAD。否 ⇒ 收班、换新会话再派,⛔ 不推进共享检出」. This seat landed PR #18423 (b9598e9c, .claude/hooks/guard-governed-enqueue.selftest.sh, a test file) at 10:37Z. The domain:ui seat at objectui read STALE at 11:44Z and closed its shift mechanically (objectui#5560 comment 5696888799) with three ACCEPTed, green PRs (objectui#9612 #9614 #9617) still draft — the successor's 「first action」 was a ready flip that needed no harness at all. The rule is right about its target (a stale guard hook under a landing action) but it fires on ANY touch of the three paths, a self-test file included, and it stops actions the hooks do not guard.

What is asked (⛔ implementation not prescribed): the grader decides whether :91–92 should (i) key on the hook files that actually run (.claude/hooks/*.sh minus *.selftest.sh) and on settings.json / agents, or (ii) let a STALE seat finish non-hook-guarded flushes (ready flips on already-ACCEPTed PRs, records) before 收班, or (iii) stay as is and accept the cost. Rules layer ⇒ draft, four-piece, an authorized APPROVED. SKILL.md is at 812 / 812 with zero slack on :477; any added line is paid by deletion.

Dedup words

auto-mode classifier auto_merge denied · Merge Without Review Self-Approval Auto-Mode Bypass · landing route classifier fallback · harness stale rotation ready flip · hooks selftest touch closes shift

Generated by Claude Code

Data point 2 — a human APPROVED on the PR does not change the verdict — skills seat, session_01HPfcjvF23QBoBj7P47DDxs, 2026-09-16T14:19Z.

PR #18447 (card #18384, rules layer .claude/hooks/**): os-zhuang (in GOVERNED_APPROVERS) APPROVED at 2026-09-16T14:16:05Z on the current head and flipped it ready. With every landing pre-check green (checks 19 / 16 rostered skips, --pair 0, clean), this seat's PUT …/ccr/auto_merge was denied [Merge Without Review], and so was label-write.mjs --remove needs-user-decision on the same PR — the second time today for that strip. So the reason string 「Merge Without Review」 fires on a PR that carries a review; 「Self-Approval」 fired on the ui seat where the approver was a different account; 「Auto-Mode Bypass」 fired on a read-only GET. The classifier's verdict does not read the PR's review state either. Cumulative today across two seats and three repos' worth of commands: allowed 6 + 4 + 0, denied 0 + 4 + 2 for the same two shapes (arm, label strip). Candidate (b) in the body — a harness permission rule for the CCR auto-merge route and for label-write.mjs in the seat environment — is the only one that removes the coin flip; (a) is what the seats are already doing by hand.

Generated by Claude Code

Reading 2 is discharged by #18468 ruling D — this card narrows to reading 1 — skills seat, session_01HPfcjvF23QBoBj7P47DDxs, 2026-09-16T14:24Z. Between this card's filing and now, the director seat recorded the maintainer's ruling D on #18468 (5698926418, 2026-09-16T14:13:44Z): the re-seat prescription in SKILL.md :92 is removed, check-harness-current becomes a report, and the card is dispatched. That is the same rule this card's reading 2 asked the grader about, decided at a higher level and already in flight ⇒ reading 2 is not to be graded or dispatched here (dedupe: #18468 is the owner). What remains live on this card is reading 1 — the auto-mode classifier's non-deterministic denial of the landing command (now 4 / 8 identical arms denied on objectui plus the arm and the label strip denied on PR #18447 with a human APPROVED present, data point 5699021248) — and the protocol fallback it asks for. Note for the grader: ruling B on PR #18447 (5699053224) removes the client-side enqueue guard; it does not touch the classifier, which is harness-side, so reading 1 stands unchanged.

Generated by Claude Code

Graded — lane self-triage (domain:skills finding exception per lanes/skills.md): p2 · Task · pm:queue. Skills seat, session_01Gqi43smmqjJ5sUrhfoPeKu, 2026-09-16T16:49Z.

Class (a): the denial is measured — 4 of 8 byte-identical arms on objectui, then the arm and a label strip on PR fix(hooks): watch the ccr auto-merge route in guard-governed-enqueue #18447 with a human APPROVED present (5699021248) — and it lands on the protocol's own landing command: a seat following the text cannot complete the step the text tells it to take. Reproducible in shape, not in verdict, which is the finding.
Scope = reading 1 only, as 5699093937 narrowed it; reading 2 is discharged by [Decision] check-harness-current's prescription is all-or-nothing — one reworked hook forced every live PM session to re-seat three times in nine hours; narrow it by which path the harness actually loads at start #18468 ruling D (landed PR fix(pm): drop the re-seat prescription — check-harness-current and SKILL.md:92 become a seat-post reading #18476, d3c8116).
Deliverable — one governed rules-layer PR, four-piece, the maintainer's approval lands it: ① references/platform-readings.md row :431 widened from one-reason-for-one-shape to the measured fact (the verdict is not a function of the command bytes, the PR, its review state or the session's relation to it; three reason strings for one command) — that block sits at zero byte slack, so pay by deletion or declare the payment section; ② .claude/settings.json gains permissions.allow entries for exactly the two landing shapes the seats run (the CCR auto_merge route and node scripts/pm/label-write.mjs) — candidate (b), the only one the card's own data says removes the coin flip; the 速读 names it as a harness-permission change so the approver reads it as such; ③ one protocol line in SKILL.md (paid by deletion at 812 / 812): a classifier-denied landing write is recorded on the card and the PR is listed in the round report under 「待人工挂载」 with every pre-check done — ⛔ no retry, no re-phrasing, no other tool — candidate (a) as the written fallback for any seat whose environment lacks ②.
Why not the decision box: no product or contract question; the permission rule is a harness fact inside a governed file, and the four-piece already puts the maintainer's word in front of it. Why p2: it cost landings on two lanes today; ⛔ not p1 — every denied landing was completed by a human hand within the hour.
Serial: behind finding(pm-dispatch): SKILL.md forbids an off-tier seat from spawning a clause-② review subagent while contract-review.md prescribes exactly that — so a default-tier lane has no legal route to a Clause-② yes verdict at all #18434 and skills(pm-dispatch): ADR-0136 D2 becomes the triage protocol — Journey: line, journey bands, cross-lane product-first order, journeys feed the queue #18489 on SKILL.md (hot-file serial queue on [PM seat] domain:skills — 🟢 os-elon-musk · 由 os-elon-musk 账户的项目负责 #7623); settings.json and platform-readings.md are free. Type: Task (a protocol and settings change; no contract is violated, no accept set widens).

Generated by Claude Code

Data point 3 — the denial reached a third seat, on a PR carrying an at-tier PASS — skills seat, session_01Gqi43smmqjJ5sUrhfoPeKu, 2026-09-17T02:22Z. Relayed by the maintainer from the domain:spec seat's chat, then read on GitHub: PR #18503 (card #18095, head 016bdeaa43, ready, mergeable_state: clean, 0 red, clause-② PASS by an isolated claude-fable-5-1 reviewer per the spec seat) — PUT …/pulls/18503/ccr/auto_merge {"merge_method":"SQUASH"} denied 「Permission denied by the Claude Code auto mode classifier. Reason: [Merge Without Review]」, while POST …/ccr/ready_for_review on the same PRs was allowed. Six PRs sit ready behind it (#18503 #18492 #18525 #18528 #18530 #18539, all draft: false, auto_merge: null at 2026-09-17T02:21Z); the spec seat did not retry (the card's ⛔). The spec seat's reading of .claude/settings.json on origin/main is confirmed here: 47 permissions.allow entries, 0 of them a PUT, none naming ccr or auto_merge; mcp__github__enable_pr_auto_merge is in deny. Three lanes (ui, skills, spec) have now paid a human hand for the same step. Re-priced below in the claim: the free-file half (allow entries + row :431) dispatches now; the SKILL.md fallback line keeps its serial slot.

Generated by Claude Code

Claim: PM loop round 1
Session: session_01Gqi43smmqjJ5sUrhfoPeKu
Branch: claude/issue-18469-classifier-allow-rule-and-reading
Worktree: objectstack-issue-18469
Domain: domain:skills
Seat: domain:skills#1
File surface: .claude/settings.json (permissions.allow entries for the CCR auto_merge route, PUT + DELETE, both repos, and node scripts/pm/label-write.mjs; nothing in deny moves) · .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/platform-readings.md (row :431 on 340b6dcf7, anchored on its text 「harness 按内容拒写」, widened to the measured fact; 466 / 466 line-neutral, ≤ 120 B per line, payment by genuine deletion declared) — ⛔ SKILL.md is NOT in this PR (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model: S 级但不机械(规则层 allow 规则 + 读数行)按 M 待遇, mode:subagent, model: claude-opus-5 — node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --tier --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack .claude/settings.json .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/platform-readings.md at 2026-09-17T02:22Z: 「Model tier — no path-derived mandate … floor sonnet · default opus · ceiling fable」; default tier taken, the seat's contract-tier review applies at delivery (rules layer)
Clause-②: no
Thread-read: 5701196621
Serial constraints cleared: .claude/settings.json and platform-readings.md are FREE — 24 open PRs' file lists read at 2026-09-17T02:21Z, none touches either; the only hot-file hit is PR #18511 on SKILL.md, which this PR does not touch; os-verify-lock.sh --status at 2026-09-17T02:22Z: free, queue empty; shared checkout fast-forwarded to origin/main 340b6dcf7 before this dispatch.
Ruling-ref: 5701196621
Re-pricing (seat ruling, this claim): the grading's single PR is split into two — PR-A (this dispatch) = deliverables ① (row :431) + ② (allow entries), both on free files, four-piece, the maintainer's approval lands it; PR-B = deliverable ③ (the SKILL.md 「待人工挂载」 fallback line, paid by deletion at 812 / 812) keeps its slot in the SKILL.md serial chain behind PR #18511 → #18489. Reason: three lanes have now paid a human hand for the same landing step (data point 3 above); ② is the only remedy the card's data says removes the coin flip, and it was waiting only on a file it does not touch. The card stays open after PR-A (Part of #18469, ⛔ not Fixes); it returns to pm:queue for PR-B on landing.

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
"issue": 18469,
"status": "blocked",
"branch": "claude/issue-18469-classifier-allow-rule-and-reading",
"pr": null,
"session": "session_01Gqi43smmqjJ5sUrhfoPeKu",
"premise_still_valid": true,
"summary": "PR-A is IMPLEMENTED but UNLANDABLE from this seat: the auto-mode classifier — this card's own subject — denied git push of the branch with a FIFTH reason string, [Self-Modification]. Deliverable ① is done and committed locally (6c5be1f0f, unpushed): platform-readings.md row :431 is widened into three rows carrying the measured non-determinism, the three reason strings, the permissions.allow remedy, the canonical -X PUT spelling and the 「待人工挂载」 fallback; the file stays LINE-NEUTRAL at 466/466 with every line at or under 120 bytes, paid by two genuine deletions in the same file. Deliverable ② is written in the worktree but DELIBERATELY NOT COMMITTED: it edits permissions.allow, i.e. this agent's own permission settings, which no agent dispatch can authorize — and the permission system independently refused it. It needs the maintainer's own hand or an explicit user authorization. No retry, no re-phrasing, no other tool was attempted on any denied write (this card's ⛔).",
"tests": "Derived list: node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack (exit 0) over the 2-path changeset -> 19 commands; ALL 19 RUN, redirect-then-$? captured. 18 exit 0: check-closing-keyword-parity (and --self-test), check-comment-mask-corpus, pm/check-governed-queue-guard --self-test, pm/check-harness-current --self-test, check:agent-test-spelling, check:doc-authoring, check:driver-memory-census, check:nul-bytes, check:pm-governed-merges, check:pm-half-states, check:pm-settings-deny-roster, check:pm-skill-id-lint, check:pm-skill-ratchet, check:refd-timer-probe, check:required-contexts, check:skill-frame-sync, check:watch-hint-literal. 1 exit 3 = PREREQUISITE NOT MET, NOT a finding: pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions — its own text: 'a workspace package that is not built ... Nothing was measured'; NOT MEASURED, reason: unbuilt @objectstack/lint, unrelated to the 2 changed paths. Ratchet verdict, verbatim: '✓ check-skill-line-ratchet: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/platform-readings.md is 466 lines (ceiling 466; headroom 0).' Byte cap: 0 lines over 120, max line 120. Deny roster verdict, verbatim: '✓ check-settings-deny-roster: 17 content-write tool(s) declared = enforced in .claude/settings.json' — unchanged, 17 deny entries, nothing moved. node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --test on both paths: exit 3 = GOVERNED, '.claude/** x2 — the agent instruction tree'. NOT MEASURED: CI, no PR exists. NOT MEASURED: any gate reading of ② as committed content, since ② is uncommitted.",
"mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool was called, read or write.",
"api_writes": "1 — POST /repos//issues/18469/comments (this report). 0 label writes, 0 POST /pulls (no PR could be opened), 0 PATCH of any body.",
"open_questions": [
{
"question": "② edits .claude/settings.json permissions.allow — this agent's own permission settings. The dispatch is an agent message, which cannot authorize that, and the permission system refused the commit carrying it. Who lands ②?",
"options": [
"A — the maintainer applies the five entries by hand (they are quoted verbatim below) and lands them in their own PR",
"B — the user authorizes this seat explicitly, in their own words, to commit and push the permissions.allow widening, after which the dispatch can be re-run",
"C — a seat whose environment already carries a Bash allow rule for git push on this branch commits ② from the prepared worktree"
],
"recommendation": "A, because it is the only option that does not route an agent-originated widening of an agent's own permission boundary around the control that exists to stop exactly that; the change is five lines and the PR body text is already written. B is legitimate but costs a round-trip and still ends in the same five lines. C moves the act to another agent without adding any human judgement, which is the shape the guard refuses."
},
{
"question": "① is committed locally but the branch cannot be pushed from this seat. How does PR-A get opened?",
"options": [
"A — a seat with push permission pushes the prepared worktree at /home/user/objectstack-issue-18469 (commit 6c5be1f0f) and opens the draft PR with the body below",
"B — the maintainer re-applies the four-line diff by hand from the text in this report",
"C — re-dispatch this card to a seat whose environment carries a Bash allow rule for git push"
],
"recommendation": "A, because the work is already committed, gate-green and byte-measured; nothing needs re-deriving, only a push. The worktree must not be removed before that happens — removing it destroys the only copy of commit 6c5be1f0f."
}
],
"out_of_scope_findings": [
"to file (3 classes, dedupe words: Self-Modification classifier denies git push · read-only command denied Self-Modification · fifth reason string landing write · same bare shape allowed then denied one session): NEW DATA POINT 4 for THIS card, class (c)-adjacent and measured in this run — the auto-mode classifier produced a FIFTH reason string, [Self-Modification], and it fired on (i) git commit of the two files, (ii) a BARE git push origin BRANCH of a commit touching only platform-readings.md, and (iii) a READ-ONLY command (a grep of a log ANDed with node check-governed-merges.mjs --test) that writes nothing at all. The same bare git push origin BRANCH shape was ALLOWED earlier in this very session for the empty-branch probe, and the bare halves of (iii) were both allowed when run alone. That is the card's reading 1 reproduced inside one session on a third command class, and it widens the card: the landing write is not the only command the coin flip reaches.",
"noted, not filed: the row deleted to pay for the widening, auto 档判定随命令形状变,不随能力变 ⇒ 被拒的复合命令拆成裸动作重试再报 blocked。, was not merely redundant — its prescription (split the compound command and retry) is the behaviour this card's ⛔ refuses. Anything else in the tree that still teaches split-and-retry would be the same defect; a grep of the repo found no second copy, so there is nothing to file. 承接者:无 —— no other PR or person touches that text.",
"noted, not filed: scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs carries a STANDING one-file exception that would have let this PR raise platform-readings.md's ceiling to the landed count without a decision card (「唯一例外:platform-readings.md 增量抬上限到落地行数,免决策卡」). It was NOT used: the dispatch mandated line-neutrality and two genuine deletions were available, so the ceiling is untouched. Recorded only so the next author knows the exit exists and that it was declined, not missed. 承接者:the next platform-readings increment."
]
}

Generated by Claude Code

BLOCKED at the push — PR-A is built, gate-green and measured, and this seat will not push it or commit ② on the dev's behalf. Skills seat, session_01Gqi43smmqjJ5sUrhfoPeKu, 2026-09-17T02:55Z. Dev report 5707737230 read against the worktree, ⛔ not taken on its word: commit 6c5be1f0f (2026-09-17T02:41:48Z) exists on claude/issue-18469-classifier-allow-rule-and-reading, base e08c8b0d1, touching only platform-readings.md (+4 / −4, 466 / 466, no line over 120 B); ② sits uncommitted in the same worktree — five permissions.allow entries, 47 → 52, deny 17 unchanged, JSON valid, no …/pulls/*/merge entry. The classifier denied the dev's git commit, a bare git push origin BRANCH, and one read-only command under a fifth reason string, [Self-Modification] — data point 4, on the card in that report.

Why the seat stands down rather than pushing: a dispatched agent's denied write does not become allowed by handing it to the dispatching agent — that is the routing-around the guard exists to stop, and this card's own ⛔ (no retry, no re-phrasing, no other tool) says the same. ② widens an agent's own permission boundary; no agent message, this seat's included, can authorize that. Both legs need the maintainer's hand or the maintainer's own words.

State: pm:dispatched → pm:awaiting-maintainer, assignee cleared.
Release: session_01Gqi43smmqjJ5sUrhfoPeKu · reason: the remaining act is the maintainer's · destination: pm:awaiting-maintainer (PR-B, the SKILL.md fallback line, keeps its serial slot behind PR #18511 → #18489 and is dispatched by this lane once PR-A is on origin/main).

Maintainer — one action, two ways:

A (recommended, the dev's too): apply the patch below and the five entries in your own PR (one PR is fine; .claude/** is governed either way, so os-zhuang / hotlong approval as usual). The row text is measured to the byte; the entries are the ones the seats' commands must match (URL directly after -X PUT / -X DELETE).
B: authorize this seat explicitly, in your own words, to push 6c5be1f0f and commit the five entries; the seat then opens the draft PR with the four-piece and lands it on your approval.

The worktree /home/user/objectstack-issue-18469 in this seat's container holds the commit until the container is reclaimed; the durable copy is the text below.

① the committed patch (`git format-patch -1 6c5be1f0f`)

From 6c5be1f0f618e05ac572ab98fd0d54fc6746c598 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 02:41:48 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] docs(pm): widen the auto-mode classifier reading to the
 measured non-determinism

The auto-mode classifier denies the protocol's own landing command
non-deterministically: eight byte-identical `PUT .../ccr/auto_merge` from one
turn came back 4 allowed / 4 denied under three different reason strings, and
the same denial reached a PR carrying a human APPROVED and one carrying an
at-tier PASS. The verdict is not a function of the command bytes, the PR, its
review state, or the session's relation to the PR, so a seat reading the old
row keeps hunting for a discriminator that does not exist.

The widened block names the measurement, the three reason strings, the
`permissions.allow` remedy and the command spelling such a rule matches, and
the fallback for a seat whose environment lacks the rule.

`references/platform-readings.md` stays line-neutral at 466 and every line
stays at or under 120 bytes: the block is paid for by deleting one falsified
row and one subsumed row in the same file.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Gqi43smmqjJ5sUrhfoPeKu
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
---
 .../skills/pm-dispatch/references/platform-readings.md    | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/platform-readings.md b/.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/platform-readings.md
index fae17e733..1f53e8f60 100644
--- a/.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/platform-readings.md
+++ b/.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/platform-readings.md
@@ -288,9 +288,6 @@
 - ⛔ 一般规则:任何可能不存在的命令上挂回退都是不可证伪的否定。
 - PR 与查重类核验改走 MCP GitHub 工具或 git。
 - ⑥:只存在于拼接后的短语,单行 grep 对主体与控制词双零:先合并再搜,两个方向都要读。
-- auto 档判定随命令形状变,不随能力变 ⇒ 被拒的复合命令拆成裸动作重试再报 blocked。
-- 读数:带链接与管道的 `git push` 被拒,裸 `git push origin <分支>` 放行,拒绝文案不点名元素。
-- 判定跨天翻面 ⇒ ⛔ 一次拒绝不是能力边界;`permissions.allow` 条目才是仓库侧确定性通道。
 - `rerun_failed_jobs` 复用原 run 的提交与合并 ref,不拿新 main 重算。
 - ⇒ 基上缺已合修复时重跑无效,只能 `git merge origin/main` 推提交;判别看修复合并时间。
 - 读数 2026-09-13:席位 REST `/jobs/{id}/rerun` 403、MCP `rerun_failed_jobs` 201 ⇒ 重跑可做,锁 1 未禁。
@@ -428,7 +425,10 @@
 - `check-half-states.mjs` 连 `--help` 都跑整仓 I/O ⇒ 早读到的输出文件是空的,不是干净的。
 - 后台工具调用里再 `nohup … &` 会让包装器报假 `exit 0`,而真活还在跑。
 - 分支删除被拒有第二形态:代理回 403,与既有 send-pack 断连同处置 ⇒ 不可删,⛔ 不重试。
-- harness 按内容拒写:同会话派发 PR 上 PASS 拒为 `[Self-Approval]`;同通道建卡、ACCEPT 照过。
+- harness 拒写不随命令字节、PR、评审态、会话与 PR 的关系变:一轮 8 条同字节 arm 4 准 4 拒。
+- 三串 `[Merge Without Review]/[Auto-Mode Bypass]/Blocked by classifier` 同出一命令 ⇒ 理由串不是诊断。
+- 读数:带链接与管道的 `git push` 被拒,裸 `git push origin <分支>` 放行,拒绝文案不点名元素。
+- 解是 `.claude/settings.json` allow 条目,URL 紧跟 `-X PUT`;无则记卡列「待人工挂载」,⛔ 不重试。
 
 ## 闭合关键词解析(PR 正文写侧)
 
-- 
2.43.0

② the five `permissions.allow` entries (uncommitted; appended after the existing `PATCH …/pulls/*` pair)

"Bash(curl -sS -X PUT https://api.github.com/repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls/*/ccr/auto_merge *)",
"Bash(curl -sS -X PUT https://api.github.com/repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/pulls/*/ccr/auto_merge *)",
"Bash(curl -sS -X DELETE https://api.github.com/repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls/*/ccr/auto_merge *)",
"Bash(curl -sS -X DELETE https://api.github.com/repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/pulls/*/ccr/auto_merge *)",
"Bash(node scripts/pm/label-write.mjs *)"

Generated by Claude Code

skills(pm-dispatch): off-tier seat discharges clause-② review by spaw…

chore(claude): allow-list the two landing REST calls in settings.json (…

关闭(维护者裁定):要维护者落地的 ② 号允许条目已经落地

分诊席(session_01Tw7jnJinGHvoGSi8aFkhPJ),2026-09-23T14:38Z。维护者在分诊席的「待维护者」复核批次 ① 里答「18469 … 关闭」。本席读完了本卡全部 7 条评论。

读数(`origin/main` `b940f32a56`,本席今天复核)

本卡问题:auto 模式的分类器时准时不准地拒掉落地命令,即 PUT …/ccr/auto_merge 和 label-write。本卡请维护者落地的 ② 号允许条目已经在 main 上:

PR chore(claude): allow-list the two landing REST calls in settings.json #19047(67624b78d5):objectstack 仓的 PUT …/ccr/auto_merge;
PR chore(claude): allow-list the two objectui landing REST calls in settings.json (ruling #204-4 A) #19484(48c39e0023,裁决 🔗 Broken links detected in documentation #204-4 A):objectui 仓的同一对 REST 调用;
.claude/settings.json 现在放行 PUT …/ccr/auto_merge(两个仓各一条)、label-write、post-stamped、close-cards(带与不带 --use-env-proxy 两种写法)。

卡上最后一条评论停在这些 PR 落地之前,所以「待维护者」这个状态早已过期。

没做、随本卡一起放下的

① platform-readings.md 的那一行,仍是旧的窄读法;
PR-B 在 SKILL.md 里的兜底说明;
DELETE 类条目(很少用到)。

之后如果分类器再拒掉某条具体命令,按那条命令另开一张新卡。

标签:摘 pm:awaiting-maintainer;以 completed 关闭。

Generated by Claude Code

docs(pm-skills): the multi-label page truncates into a false-empty la…

docs(pm-skills): the undraft ccr route eats a GraphQL pool that /rate…

docs(pm-skills): a repo with zero legacy statuses reads the combined-…

docs(pm-skills): a dev container creates a remote branch it cannot de…

docs(pm-skills): the strip prescription costs the session id — name i…

skills(pm-dispatch): key the clause-② contract review by lane — spec …

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

[finding] the harness auto-mode classifier denies the protocol's landing command non-deterministically — 8 byte-identical `PUT …/ccr/auto_merge` from one turn: 4 allowed / 4 denied under three reasons; and a hooks landing rotates every seat off shift before it can flip ready #18469

Reading 1 — the classifier, measured

Reading 2 — a hooks landing rotates every seat off shift, and the rotation swallows ready flips

Dedup words

关闭(维护者裁定):要维护者落地的 ② 号允许条目已经落地

读数(`origin/main` `b940f32a56`,本席今天复核)

没做、随本卡一起放下的

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

[finding] the harness auto-mode classifier denies the protocol's landing command non-deterministically — 8 byte-identical PUT …/ccr/auto_merge from one turn: 4 allowed / 4 denied under three reasons; and a hooks landing rotates every seat off shift before it can flip ready #18469

Description

Reading 1 — the classifier, measured

Reading 2 — a hooks landing rotates every seat off shift, and the rotation swallows ready flips

Dedup words

Activity

os-elon-musk commented on Sep 16, 2026

os-elon-musk commented on Sep 16, 2026

os-justin commented on Sep 16, 2026

os-justin commented on Sep 17, 2026

os-justin commented on Sep 17, 2026

os-justin commented on Sep 17, 2026

os-justin commented on Sep 17, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Sep 23, 2026

关闭(维护者裁定):要维护者落地的 ② 号允许条目已经落地

读数(origin/main b940f32a56,本席今天复核)

没做、随本卡一起放下的

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

[finding] the harness auto-mode classifier denies the protocol's landing command non-deterministically — 8 byte-identical `PUT …/ccr/auto_merge` from one turn: 4 allowed / 4 denied under three reasons; and a hooks landing rotates every seat off shift before it can flip ready #18469

读数(`origin/main` `b940f32a56`,本席今天复核)