Coral is pre-1.0. Until v1.0 ships, only the latest 0.x.y release receives
security fixes. After v1.0, we'll maintain the most recent minor line.
| Version | Status |
|---|---|
0.5.x |
Supported (current) |
0.4.x and earlier |
Not supported — upgrade. |
Please don't open a public issue for security-sensitive reports. Use GitHub's Report a vulnerability flow from the Security tab of this repository. The advisory channel is private and goes directly to the maintainers. We'll acknowledge within 3 business days and aim for a fix or mitigation timeline within 10 business days of acknowledgment.
GitHub private vulnerability reporting is the only supported channel pre-1.0. We may add a dedicated security email at v1.0 once we have a stable contact alias in place.
When reporting, please include:
- A clear description of the issue and the impact.
- Steps to reproduce, ideally with a minimal proof-of-concept.
- The Coral version (
coral --version), Python version, and OS. - Your suggested fix or mitigation, if you have one.
We do not pay bounties in v1.x. We do credit reporters in the advisory and in the release notes, with permission.
In scope:
- The Python daemon (
coral/in this repository) — vault, crypto, HTTP API, MCP server, policy engine, audit log. - The Chrome extension (
extension/) — manifest permissions, token handling, CORS posture, capture flow. - The packaged
coralbridgedistribution on PyPI (once published). - The bundled behavior packs (
coral/behavior_packs/*.yaml).
Out of scope:
- The user's local machine. Coral runs locally; an attacker with root
or same-user access has already won. See
THREAT_MODEL.md"Self-attack scenarios" appendix for the tiered analysis. - Third-party dependencies. Report
playwright,sqlcipher3,cryptography,mcp, FastAPI, etc. vulnerabilities to their respective upstream projects. We'll bump pins promptly when alerted. - Indirect prompt injection through page content reaching an agent. Documented as out of scope in spec §6.2 T11 — that's the agent's problem.
- Malicious agents with valid CDP access to a session they've been granted. Documented accepted risk in spec §6.2 T6 — choose your agents.
The authoritative document is THREAT_MODEL.md. It
walks T1 through T11 plus a "Self-attack scenarios" appendix that maps
attacker capability tiers (A through F) to what each can achieve.
- We will not silently fix security issues. Every fix gets a CVE-style
advisory + a
CHANGELOG.mdentry. - We will not retaliate against good-faith reporters.
- We will not deny issues just because they're inconvenient. If we disagree with a report, we'll explain why in the advisory.
- Don't probe production systems you don't own.
- Don't exfiltrate user data beyond what's needed to demonstrate the issue.
- Give us a reasonable disclosure window before going public.