docs(README): redesign for better readability and appeal - #10
Conversation
Restructure README with a clearer narrative: Why -> Quick Start -> How It Works -> Commands. Add CI badge, improve worktree layout diagrams showing both single and multi-repo, and streamline the command reference with inline examples. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 11 minutes and 4 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughREADME.mdを構造的なガイドに再構成しました。「Why?」セクション、拡張された「How It Works」、リファクタリングされたコマンドドキュメント、自動依存関係インストールに関する新しいセクション、および環境変数情報を追加しました。 Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request significantly refactors the README.md to improve documentation clarity, adding a quick-start guide, visual directory structures, and streamlined command references. Feedback suggests enhancing the single-repo diagram for better clarity and including command aliases for the cleanup utility to maintain consistency across the documentation.
Show source files in the project directory and add generated comment on CLAUDE.md for consistency with the multi-repo diagram. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 58-66: The fenced code block showing the directory tree in
README.md lacks a language specifier; update the opening fence (the line with
```) to include a language tag such as "text" or "plaintext" so it becomes
```text (or ```plaintext) to follow Markdown best practices and ensure the
directory structure is rendered correctly; modify the existing triple-backtick
fence that surrounds the directory diagram accordingly.
- Around line 38-52: The README's directory-structure code block is missing a
Markdown language specifier; update the fenced code block surrounding the tree
(the triple-backtick block containing the ~/git-repos/ tree) to include a
language like "text" or "plaintext" (e.g., change ``` to ```text) so the block
follows Markdown best practices and ensures correct formatting/rendering.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
Add clean/rm aliases for consistency with list (ls) and checkout (co). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Summary
Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit
ドキュメント