Add a licence and a security policy - #205
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This is a public repository with no licence, which means nobody may legally reuse any of it — not the compose files, not the modules, not the manifests. MIT, matching the only licence already in the estate (docker-strapi). Say the word if Apache-2.0 is preferred; it is one file. SECURITY.md says what is actually worth reporting here rather than repeating a template: where a private report matters, and what the repository already covers so a reporter does not spend time on it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01F9MnUHayBCrncnczqMhSVy
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
LICENSE(MIT) and aSECURITY.mdwritten for this repository rather than from a template.Why
This is a public repository with no licence — nobody may legally reuse any of it. MIT matches the only licence already in the estate. Copyright line is
2026 Philipp Matthias Hauptmann; say the word if you'd prefer Apache-2.0 or a different name, it's one file.SECURITY.mdsays what's actually worth a private report here — a secret committed by mistake, or a compose file exposing a service it shouldn't (a port published to0.0.0.0, a missing auth layer) — and what's already covered, so a reporter doesn't spend time on it: every image digest-pinned,gitleaksin hooks and CI, the weekly advisory trivy sweep. It's explicit that vulnerabilities in Jellyfin, Paperless-ngx and the rest belong upstream.Checklist
make checkpasses — no code, compose file or script is touched; the diff is two new documentation files.env,backup.envor credential in the diff🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01F9MnUHayBCrncnczqMhSVy
Generated by Claude Code