chore(deps): update bytes to v1.11.1 - #276
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Alex Leong <alex@buoyant.io>
cratelyn
reviewed
Feb 13, 2026
cratelyn
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
thank you for opening this @adleong! i really appreciate all the work you've been doing.
error[unmaintained]: rustls-pemfile is unmaintained
┌─ /github/workspace/Cargo.lock:90:1
│
90 │ rustls-pemfile 2.2.0 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
│ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unmaintained advisory detected
│
├ ID: RUSTSEC-2025-0134
├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2025-0134
├ The rustls-pemfile crate is no longer maintained. The repository has been archived since August
2025, and users are encouraged to depend directly on the underlying PEM parsing code included
in rustls-pki-types since 1.9.0. The latest version of rustls-pemfile is in fact a thin wrapper
around the same code used in rustls-pki-types, so migrating should be straightforward.
The new API is represented by the [`PemObject`][PemObject] trait, which provides methods for
reading a single or multiple PEM objects from a file or byte slice.
[PemObject]: https://docs.rs/rustls-pki-types/latest/rustls_pki_types/pem/trait.PemObject.html
├ Announcement: https://github.com/rustls/pemfile/issues/61
├ Solution: No safe upgrade is available!
├ rustls-pemfile v2.2.0
└── kubert v0.25.0
└── linkerd-extension-init v0.1.0
it looks like there is a failure in the dependency audit, unrelated to this upgrade.
we will need to solicit a new kubert release, including this pull request: olix0r/kubert#432 we could, alternatively, add an allowance for that dependency to our deny.toml. i would really prefer not to do this though.
cratelyn
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To address GHSA-434x-w66g-qw3r