Skip to content

[CI] Add CMake lint job#474

Merged
aobolensk merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
codex/add-cmake-lint-workflow
Jun 23, 2025
Merged

[CI] Add CMake lint job#474
aobolensk merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
codex/add-cmake-lint-workflow

Conversation

@aobolensk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@aobolensk aobolensk commented Jun 23, 2025

  • add workflow to lint cmake files using cmake-format
  • remove duplicate patterns in workflow triggers

@aobolensk aobolensk requested a review from allnes as a code owner June 23, 2025 16:42
@aobolensk aobolensk changed the title Add CMake lint workflow [CI] Add CMake lint job Jun 23, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the ci label Jun 23, 2025
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Jun 23, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.15%. Comparing base (d1764d8) to head (c3560ff).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #474   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.15%   92.15%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines         357      357           
  Branches      116      127   +11     
=======================================
  Hits          329      329           
  Misses         10       10           
  Partials       18       18           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@aobolensk aobolensk added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 23, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit 021ba8b Jun 23, 2025
78 checks passed
@aobolensk aobolensk deleted the codex/add-cmake-lint-workflow branch June 24, 2025 06:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants