Skip to content

Train database usage #10

Closed
Closed

Description

@ZhiyuanChen

Hi,

I noticed you are using a combination of database including rnacentral, rfam, ensembl and nt.

Can I please ask why did you chose these databases?

Specifically, rnacentral should be a superset of rfam and ensembl. While nt is not a part of rnacentral, it should have been very similar to the ENA database, which is also a subset of rnacentral.

Besides, what data deduplication pipelines is applied to remove the redundancy?

Activity

  1. RJPenic commented on Jun 13, 2024

    @RJPenic
    Contributor

    Hello, sorry for the late reply.

    We wanted to expand our dataset with as many ncRNA as we could find. Still, majority of our dataset consisted of sequences from RNAcentral (mostly because, as you said, most of these datasets are at least to some degree a subset of RNAcentral). However, inclusion of additional datasets added several million sequences that were not found in the RNAcentral.

    To prevent potential redundancy in the dataset we used seqkit's rmdup tool to remove sequence duplicates and we clustered the sequences with MMSeqs2.

  2. ZhiyuanChen commented on Jun 13, 2024

    @ZhiyuanChen
    Author

    Thank you so much for answering!

    Can you please covert this issue to discussion?

  3. locked and limited conversation to collaborators on Jun 13, 2024
  4. converted this issue into a discussion #11 on Jun 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions