BE-474: HashQL: Take into account terminator target eligibility in execution backend placement by indietyp · Pull Request #8587 · hashintel/hash

indietyp · 2026-03-26T08:16:39Z

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

🔗 Related links

...

🚫 Blocked by

...

🔍 What does this change?

...

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

do not affect the execution graph

⚠️ Known issues

🐾 Next steps

🛡 What tests cover this?

❓ How to test this?

Checkout the branch / view the deployment
Try X
Confirm that Y

📹 Demo

vercel · 2026-03-26T08:16:43Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 26, 2026 7:34am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	May 26, 2026 7:34am

2 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign	Ignored	Preview	May 26, 2026 7:34am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	May 26, 2026 7:34am

indietyp · 2026-03-26T08:17:03Z

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

codecov · 2026-03-26T08:21:00Z

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 92.97297% with 26 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 58.83%. Comparing base (cb459a8) to head (65a8a94).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ass/execution/statement_placement/embedding/mod.rs	53.12%	15 Missing ⚠️
libs/@local/hashql/mir/src/pretty/text.rs	75.00%	7 Missing ⚠️
...cal/hashql/mir/src/pass/execution/splitting/mod.rs	97.01%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...pass/execution/statement_placement/postgres/mod.rs	93.75%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8587      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.81%   58.83%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1328     1329       +1     
  Lines      126811   127250     +439     
  Branches     5790     5797       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits        74580    74867     +287     
- Misses      51350    51500     +150     
- Partials      881      883       +2

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-backend-utils	`2.81% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.52% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`28.26% <ø> (-1.38%)`	⬇️
rust.hashql-core	`79.32% <100.00%> (+0.06%)`	⬆️
rust.hashql-hir	`89.06% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`86.80% <91.50%> (+0.04%)`	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-03-26T08:25:08Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

_{Comparing bm/be-474-hashql-take-into-account-terminators-eligibility-when (65a8a94) with main (ae5c317)¹}

No successful run was found on main (cb459a8) during the generation of this report, so ae5c317 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

vercel · 2026-03-31T20:56:59Z

Deployment failed with the following error:

Invalid request: `attribution.gitUser` should NOT have additional property `isBot`.

augmentcode · 2026-04-29T17:36:06Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates HashQL execution planning so backend placement accounts for whether a block’s terminator can run on a target (and what it costs), not just the block’s statements.

Changes:

Adds `FiniteBitSet::is_superset` / `is_subset` helpers (with tests) to compare target domains.
Introduces per-block TerminatorCostVec and threads terminator costs through statement placement, block splitting, and cost aggregation.
Extends basic-block splitting to optionally peel off a dedicated “terminator region” when terminator support is narrower/incomparable vs the last statement region.
Ensures synthesized split-chain Goto terminators get zero terminator cost via TerminatorCostVec::remap tests.
Renames/clarifies transition-matrix costs to TerminatorTransitionCostVec for the solver/AC-3 path, separating “transition costs” from “terminator execution costs”.
Updates MIR text formatting to support terminator annotations, and refreshes UI/snapshot expectations accordingly.
Adjusts eval UI postgres outputs to reflect updated planning/continuation SQL generation.

Notes: This touches core placement/solver inputs (domains, splitting, cost aggregation), so correctness hinges on terminator eligibility being represented consistently across targets and after splitting.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. 2 suggestions posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

cursor

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

There are 2 total unresolved issues (including 1 from previous review).

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 53b27a5. Configure here.}

github-actions · 2026-05-26T08:50:16Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.900 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.440 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.621 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 326 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.325 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.390 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.055 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 185 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.704 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.628 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.315 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.863 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.891 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.096 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.154 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.499 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.968 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.405 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.947 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.192 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.226 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.060 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.583 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.552 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.184 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.764 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.141 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.748 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.282 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.731 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.800 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.928 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.685 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.403 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$44.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 190 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.952 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$84.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 414 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$50.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.080 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$54.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 392 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$63.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 352 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$46.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 249 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.871 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$430 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.25 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.786 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 500 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.793 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$92.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 421 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$292 \mathrm{ms} \pm 960 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.296 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$19.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 130 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.973 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$19.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.772 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$20.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 115 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.543 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$20.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 109 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.819 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$24.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 118 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.351 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 122 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.922 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 100 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.436 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 117 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.530 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$20.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 139 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.092 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$27.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.249 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$37.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 326 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$36.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$36.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 327 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.240 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$35.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 319 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$36.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 328 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}12.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$37.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 362 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$35.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 329 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$36.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 349 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.608 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$35.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 382 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$97.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 556 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$151 \mathrm{ms} \pm 778 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 546 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 518 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 562 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$127 \mathrm{ms} \pm 533 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 641 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$135 \mathrm{ms} \pm 602 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 513 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 556 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 563 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 514 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 548 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.131 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$148 \mathrm{ms} \pm 508 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.757 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.42 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}153 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$564 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.22 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}7.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

thehabbos007

Looks good to me. These comments are not blocking a merge

indietyp added 6 commits March 22, 2026 18:24

feat: checkpoint

9c6c97e

feat: checkpoint

5e3e3f6

feat: checkpoint

e0ff7d9

feat: checkpoint

954691f

feat: tests

4e01b48

feat: tests

4c01392

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut March 26, 2026 08:16 Inactive

github-actions Bot added area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team area/tests New or updated tests labels Mar 26, 2026

This was referenced Mar 26, 2026

BE-306: HashQL: PostgreSQL translation #8526

Merged

BE-455: HashQL: Introduce evaluation orchestrator #8586

Merged

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash March 26, 2026 08:30 View deployment

indietyp mentioned this pull request Mar 28, 2026

BE-482: HashQL: Remove logical not from MIR and fix postgres boolean lowering #8595

Merged

3 tasks

vilkinsons assigned indietyp Mar 31, 2026

indietyp mentioned this pull request Mar 31, 2026

BE-494: HashQL: Loop-breaker selection for recursive inlining #8600

Merged

3 tasks

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-455-hashql-create-evaluation-target-coordinator branch from 95af2dc to 8045f18 Compare March 31, 2026 20:56

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-474-hashql-take-into-account-terminators-eligibility-when branch from 890a949 to 591383f Compare March 31, 2026 20:56

indietyp mentioned this pull request Apr 5, 2026

BE-500, BE-501: HashQL: Unify mixed parameter resolution in data dependency analysis #8607

Merged

3 tasks

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut April 29, 2026 15:36 View deployment

fix: docs

d8f35ba

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut April 29, 2026 15:40 Inactive

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash April 29, 2026 15:46 View deployment

cursor Bot reviewed Apr 29, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/hashql/mir/src/pass/execution/statement_placement/postgres/mod.rs

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-474-hashql-take-into-account-terminators-eligibility-when branch from 2add45e to e6a3adb Compare April 29, 2026 15:51

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-455-hashql-create-evaluation-target-coordinator branch from 83bf74a to e30f552 Compare April 29, 2026 15:51

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut April 29, 2026 15:54 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash April 29, 2026 15:59 View deployment

augmentcode Bot reviewed Apr 29, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/hashql/mir/src/pass/execution/cost/mod.rs

Comment thread libs/@local/hashql/eval/tests/ui/postgres/constant-true-filter.aux.mir.orig Outdated

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-474-hashql-take-into-account-terminators-eligibility-when branch from e6a3adb to c044945 Compare April 30, 2026 08:53

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut April 30, 2026 08:56 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash April 30, 2026 09:03 View deployment

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-474-hashql-take-into-account-terminators-eligibility-when branch from c044945 to 5587dcd Compare April 30, 2026 09:06

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut April 30, 2026 09:10 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash April 30, 2026 09:13 View deployment

fix: tests

07720cf

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut April 30, 2026 09:56 Inactive

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash April 30, 2026 10:03 View deployment

chore: update snapshots

65a8a94

cursor Bot reviewed May 13, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/hashql/eval/tests/ui/orchestrator/.spec.toml

cursor Bot reviewed May 15, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/hashql/mir/src/pass/execution/statement_placement/postgres/mod.rs

thehabbos007 approved these changes May 26, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/hashql/mir/src/pass/execution/cost/tests.rs

Comment thread libs/@local/hashql/mir/src/pass/execution/splitting/mod.rs

Comment thread libs/@local/hashql/mir/src/pass/execution/splitting/mod.rs

indietyp mentioned this pull request Jun 4, 2026

BE-537: Remove old filter API backend and wire up HashQL in the API #8827

Draft

15 tasks

Conversation

indietyp commented Mar 26, 2026

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

🔗 Related links

🚫 Blocked by

🔍 What does this change?

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

⚠️ Known issues

🐾 Next steps

🛡 What tests cover this?

❓ How to test this?

📹 Demo

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Mar 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

indietyp commented Mar 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Mar 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Mar 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Footnotes

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Mar 31, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot commented Apr 29, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 26, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

thehabbos007 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

vercel Bot commented Mar 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

indietyp commented Mar 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Mar 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq Bot commented Mar 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading