Update npm package `vite-plugin-dts` to v5 by hash-worker[bot] · Pull Request #8129 · hashintel/hash

hash-worker · 2025-11-30T14:12:20Z

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
vite-plugin-dts (source)	`4.5.4` → `5.0.1`

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

qmhc/unplugin-dts (vite-plugin-dts)

`v5.0.1`

Compare Source

`v5.0.0`

Compare Source

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

Branch creation
- "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
Automerge
- "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

codecov · 2025-11-30T14:17:08Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.49%. Comparing base (775f4cc) to head (db2532d).
⚠️ Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8129   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.49%   62.49%           
=======================================
  Files        1318     1320    +2     
  Lines      134235   134276   +41     
  Branches     5521     5511   -10     
=======================================
+ Hits        83894    83921   +27     
- Misses      49426    49440   +14     
  Partials      915      915

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.40% <ø> (+<0.01%)`	⬆️
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.49% <ø> (+0.25%)`	⬆️
local.hash-graph-sdk	`9.63% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.87% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.19% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-tower	`67.03% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.52% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.34% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`26.38% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`37.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.45% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`29.69% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`82.29% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.43% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`69.13% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.06% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`92.64% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.05% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

cursor · 2025-12-13T09:44:49Z

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Major Vitest and vite-plugin-dts releases can break unit tests, Istanbul coverage, or .d.ts generation in CI; impact is confined to dev/build tooling, not production services.

Overview
Renovate major dependency updates for the Vitest toolchain and related build tooling, aligned with the repo already running Vitest 4.1.7 in many packages.

In @hashintel/ds-components, vite-plugin-dts is bumped from 4.5.4 to 5.0.1 (devDependency used alongside Vite for declaration emit in that package’s tooling). The PR description also targets @vitest/coverage-istanbul 3.x → 4.1.7 where Istanbul coverage is enabled; that affects CI/coverage behavior rather than runtime app code.

No application source changes—only version pins (and lockfile updates elsewhere in the full PR).

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 8a9c64c. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

vercel · 2026-01-15T12:20:11Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
ds-theme	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 4, 2026 3:49pm
hash	Error		Jun 4, 2026 3:49pm
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 4, 2026 3:49pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Error		Jun 4, 2026 3:49pm
petrinaut	Error		Jun 4, 2026 3:49pm

codspeed-hq · 2026-01-15T12:26:03Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

_{Comparing deps/js/major-vitest-npm-packages (db2532d) with main (775f4cc)¹}

No successful run was found on main (6f130ab) during the generation of this report, so 775f4cc was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

vercel · 2026-02-17T16:51:47Z

Deployment failed with the following error:

Creating the Deployment Timed Out.

cursor

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with Cloud Agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

semgrep-code-hashintel · 2026-04-09T14:55:11Z

GHSA-p9ff-h696-f583

  linkType: hard

-"vite@npm:8.0.0, vite@npm:^6.0.0 || ^7.0.0 || ^8.0.0-0":
+"vite@npm:8.0.0":


Risk: Affected versions of vite are vulnerable to Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor / Missing Authentication for Critical Function. This occurs because the Vite Dev Server WebSocket improperly exposes the fetchModule method, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass filesystem restrictions and read arbitrary files from the host machine

Manual Review Advice: A vulnerability from this advisory is reachable if you enable vite dev server using --host flag and websocket is not disabled

Fix: Upgrade this library to at least version 8.0.5 at hash/yarn.lock:45627.

Reference(s): GHSA-p9ff-h696-f583, CVE-2026-39363

🎉 Fixed in commit 3f42185 🎉

semgrep-code-hashintel · 2026-04-09T14:55:12Z

GHSA-v2wj-q39q-566r

  linkType: hard

-"vite@npm:8.0.0, vite@npm:^6.0.0 || ^7.0.0 || ^8.0.0-0":
+"vite@npm:8.0.0":


Risk: Affected versions of vite are vulnerable to Improper Access Control / Incorrect Behavior Order. Vite's dev server can bypass server.fs.deny protections: if the server is exposed to the network and a denied file is within an allowed directory, an attacker can retrieve sensitive files such as .env or certificate files by requesting them with query parameters like ?raw, ?import&raw, or ?import&url&inline.

Manual Review Advice: A vulnerability from this advisory is reachable if you enable vite dev server using --host flag and have sensitive data in deny list

Fix: Upgrade this library to at least version 8.0.5 at hash/yarn.lock:45627.

Reference(s): GHSA-v2wj-q39q-566r, CVE-2026-39364

✨ Fixed in commit 3f42185 ✨

github-actions · 2026-04-27T20:58:21Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 349 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 147 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}14.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 195 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 113 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.004 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.089 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.079 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.202 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.448 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.396 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.885 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.367 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.881 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.280 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.300 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$53.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 351 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.324 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$44.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 198 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.389 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$48.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 230 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.055 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$43.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 168 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.297 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$61.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 403 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.797 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$61.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 336 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.803 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$55.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 451 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.439 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$95.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 578 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.102 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$45.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 217 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.741 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$289 \mathrm{ms} \pm 909 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.954 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$18.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.964 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$19.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.193 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 107 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.547 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$19.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$25.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 123 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.623 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.898 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$18.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 125 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.034 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.756 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 107 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.168 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$26.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$36.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 359 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$34.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$36.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 360 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$35.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$33.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 254 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.433 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$34.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.493 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$33.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.946 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$33.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 339 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.020 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$35.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.566 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.361 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$94.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 650 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.061 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$148 \mathrm{ms} \pm 656 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.127 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 671 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.171 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 620 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.358 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$118 \mathrm{ms} \pm 647 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.986 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$128 \mathrm{ms} \pm 679 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.450 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 472 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.589 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 558 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.835 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 532 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.836 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 600 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.005 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 560 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.360 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 628 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.366 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$156 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.44 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-14.942 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$149 \mathrm{ms} \pm 560 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.015 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$41.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 185 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$537 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.12 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.578 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

hash-worker · 2026-04-30T11:17:30Z

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
the branch becomes conflicted, or
you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: yarn.lock

error This project's package.json defines "packageManager": "yarn@4.16.0". However the current global version of Yarn is 1.22.22.

Presence of the "packageManager" field indicates that the project is meant to be used with Corepack, a tool included by default with all official Node.js distributions starting from 16.9 and 14.19.
Corepack must currently be enabled by running corepack enable in your terminal. For more information, check out https://yarnpkg.com/corepack.

hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge November 30, 2025 14:12

hash-worker Bot assigned indietyp and TimDiekmann Nov 30, 2025

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-vitest-npm-packages branch from a0e15af to 2528606 Compare December 5, 2025 16:16

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign December 5, 2025 16:19 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut December 5, 2025 16:21 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash December 5, 2025 16:29 View deployment

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-vitest-npm-packages branch from 2528606 to 4a817a8 Compare December 6, 2025 11:13

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign December 6, 2025 11:17 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut December 6, 2025 11:18 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash December 6, 2025 11:26 View deployment

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-vitest-npm-packages branch from 4a817a8 to 37a896d Compare December 13, 2025 09:44

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign December 13, 2025 09:48 View deployment

cursor Bot reviewed Dec 13, 2025

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/harpc/client/typescript/package.json Outdated

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut December 13, 2025 09:49 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash December 13, 2025 09:58 View deployment

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-vitest-npm-packages branch from 37a896d to 5b663f7 Compare December 19, 2025 10:13

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign December 19, 2025 10:17 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut December 19, 2025 10:18 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash December 19, 2025 10:27 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash January 12, 2026 13:39 View deployment

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-vitest-npm-packages branch from 8fa4914 to a9bfc16 Compare January 15, 2026 12:20

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign January 15, 2026 12:23 View deployment

vercel Bot had a problem deploying to Preview – ds-theme January 15, 2026 12:23 Failure

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut January 15, 2026 12:25 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash January 15, 2026 12:32 View deployment

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-vitest-npm-packages branch from a9bfc16 to af562ba Compare January 17, 2026 20:18

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign January 17, 2026 20:21 View deployment

vercel Bot had a problem deploying to Preview – ds-theme January 17, 2026 20:21 Failure

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut January 17, 2026 20:23 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash January 17, 2026 20:31 View deployment

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-vitest-npm-packages branch from af562ba to 7277aac Compare January 21, 2026 09:18

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – ds-theme January 21, 2026 09:21 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign January 21, 2026 09:21 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut January 21, 2026 09:22 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash January 21, 2026 09:31 View deployment

cursor Bot reviewed Feb 20, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread tests/hash-backend-integration/package.json Outdated

cursor Bot reviewed Feb 25, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread .claude/hooks/package.json Outdated

cursor Bot reviewed Feb 26, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/harpc/client/typescript/package.json Outdated

github-advanced-security AI found potential problems Mar 29, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread yarn.lock Fixed

github-advanced-security AI found potential problems Apr 6, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread yarn.lock Fixed

semgrep-code-hashintel Bot reviewed Apr 9, 2026

View reviewed changes

github-advanced-security AI found potential problems Apr 9, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread yarn.lock Fixed

Comment thread yarn.lock Fixed

Comment thread yarn.lock Fixed

Comment thread yarn.lock Fixed

Update npm package vite-plugin-dts to v5

8a9c64c

Conversation

hash-worker Bot commented Nov 30, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Release Notes

v5.0.1

v5.0.0

Configuration

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Nov 30, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Dec 13, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Jan 15, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jan 15, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Footnotes

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Feb 17, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

semgrep-code-hashintel Bot Apr 9, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

semgrep-code-hashintel Bot Apr 9, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Apr 27, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

hash-worker Bot commented Apr 30, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

⚠️ Artifact update problem

File name: yarn.lock

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

hash-worker Bot commented Nov 30, 2025 •

edited

Loading

`v5.0.1`

`v5.0.0`

codecov Bot commented Nov 30, 2025 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented Dec 13, 2025 •

edited

Loading

vercel Bot commented Jan 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jan 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading

semgrep-code-hashintel Bot Apr 9, 2026 •

edited

Loading

semgrep-code-hashintel Bot Apr 9, 2026 •

edited

Loading

hash-worker Bot commented Apr 30, 2026 •

edited

Loading