🧪 Add error handling test for YAML loading in validate_weapons.rb - #37
Conversation
Added a Minitest test `test/test_validate_weapons.rb` to verify that `scripts/validate_weapons.rb` correctly rescues from YAML syntax errors when parsing files in the `weapons/` directory, rather than crashing.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
🎯 What: The testing gap addressed
The script
scripts/validate_weapons.rbhad arescue => eblock for catching YAML parsing errors when loading files from theweapons/directory, but this behavior was untested.📊 Coverage: What scenarios are now tested
A new test suite (
test/test_validate_weapons.rb) usingminitest/autorunhas been added. It creates a temporary mockweapons/directory, places a malformed YAML file inside, and executes the validation script as a subprocess. It then verifies that:Psych::SyntaxErrorand prints the error message (e.g., matching "did not find expected key").✨ Result: The improvement in test coverage
The error-handling path for reading weapon YAML files is now covered by automated tests, ensuring regressions (such as accidentally removing the
rescueblock) will be caught.PR created automatically by Jules for task 15305974614605038322 started by @hahwul