Repository navigation
Conversation
logaretm
added this pull request to stack #25201
October 15, 2026 15:13
Contributor
size-limit report 📦
|
logaretm
force-pushed
the
awad/tunnel-tanstackstart
branch
from
October 15, 2026 15:36
2202cda to
46e486c
Compare
logaretm
force-pushed
the
awad/tunnel-tanstackstart
branch
3 times, most recently
from
October 15, 2026 17:15
9069686 to
b589186
Compare
logaretm
force-pushed
the
awad/tunnel-tanstackstart
branch
3 times, most recently
from
October 15, 2026 18:16
a5fcc1b to
f2a6beb
Compare
logaretm
force-pushed
the
awad/tunnel-tanstackstart
branch
2 times, most recently
from
October 15, 2026 18:28
722f4c6 to
eec9ddf
Compare
Member
Author
|
bugbot run |
logaretm
force-pushed
the
awad/tunnel-tanstackstart
branch
from
October 16, 2026 01:51
eec9ddf to
8d3dee9
Compare
Member
Author
|
bugbot run |
1 similar comment
Member
Author
|
bugbot run |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
✅ Bugbot reviewed your changes and found no new issues!
Comment @cursor review or bugbot run to trigger another review on this PR
Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 8d3dee9. Configure here.
logaretm
force-pushed
the
awad/tunnel-tanstackstart
branch
from
October 16, 2026 02:25
8d3dee9 to
8c6c1fa
Compare
logaretm
force-pushed
the
awad/tunnel-tanstackstart
branch
2 times, most recently
from
October 16, 2026 14:00
6b24a7b to
64c909f
Compare
logaretm
force-pushed
the
awad/tunnel-tanstackstart
branch
2 times, most recently
from
October 16, 2026 16:15
7bd1c8e to
8a40b3b
Compare
logaretm
force-pushed
the
awad/tunnel-tanstackstart
branch
from
October 16, 2026 17:56
8a40b3b to
2959a87
Compare
logaretm
force-pushed
the
awad/tunnel-tanstackstart
branch
from
October 16, 2026 20:56
2959a87 to
7a741d7
Compare
…ntry
The Vite plugin now wraps the app's server entry, so `Sentry.init({ tunnel: true })`
works with no build option and tunnel requests are answered before Start's
request middleware and routing. Every `tunnelRoute` form is served the same way:
`true` uses the DSN-derived path instead of a random one per build, and a static
path no longer patches the generated route tree.
…th Start routes on
logaretm
force-pushed
the
awad/tunnel-tanstackstart
branch
from
October 16, 2026 21:02
7a741d7 to
d4c1808
Compare
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
TanStack Start picked a random tunnel path per build and patched the generated route tree to serve it.
Because the new approach relies less on build-time, the logic was changed to wrap the server entrypoint instead and only route the matching tunnel requests to our handler.
This isn't a breaking change, previously we injected a single endpoint handler, now we inject a middleware since the DSN is only known at runtime.
closes #25461