Repository navigation
feat: add NewClientWithAccessToken for Bearer-token authentication - #87
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds
NewClientWithAccessToken(accessToken string, opts ...Option). A client built this way authenticates every request withAuthorization: Bearer <token>and never adds theapp_keyquery parameter. This covers JSON, GET and multipart upload requests.NewClientis unchanged and still sendsapp_key.doMethodWithoutAppKey(the automation trigger fire endpoint) carry no client credential for either client kind. The per-request trigger token stays the only credential on them.Tests:
access_token_test.gouses httptest to assert the header is present andapp_keyis absent on each request path. It also coversNewClientregression and the empty-token error.🤖 Generated with Claude Code