Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: Optimize globals scope tracking lookup - #126

Open
ericbfriday wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
bolt-optimize-globals-scope-lookup-6170070596600731658
Open

⚡ Bolt: Optimize globals scope tracking lookup#126
ericbfriday wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
bolt-optimize-globals-scope-lookup-6170070596600731658

Conversation

@ericbfriday

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

💡 What: Added a globalNames hash map to optimize the O(N) global variable presence check within attachScope.
🎯 Why: In luaparse.js, indexOfObject(globals, 'name', node.name) was executing sequentially on an array for every global identifier in a linear lookup when collecting scope, causing unnecessary overhead for larger source files.
📊 Impact: Transforms a linear O(N) lookup within the scope parsing process to a constant time O(1) hash map check, noticeably improving parsing performance for large scopes.
🔬 Measurement: Verified the improvement with npm run bench:luast alongside all tests via npm run test successfully.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 6170070596600731658 started by @ericbfriday

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant