Tomography Slow/Fast Tests#240
Merged
Merged
Conversation
arthurmccray
approved these changes
Jun 2, 2026
arthurmccray
left a comment
arthurmccray
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The one change to ddp looks fine, and the rest are just tests
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What problem this PR addreseses
Tomography module had low coverage on PyTests - this PR includes slow and fast tests that make sure no regressions occur when implementing new workflows.
What should the reviewer(s) do
Review tests and see if they run locally.