Close the dynamic embodied Tiny Scientist loop - #16
Draft
dustinoconnor wants to merge 39 commits into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Why
The original Tiny Scientist could formulate causal records offline, while the Unity PGNW planner could only test a hand-written five-hypothesis pool. This change joins those components: embodied evidence can now cause Gemma to formulate an L1 candidate, the formal layer admits it without behavioral rule authority, PGNW selects subsequent tests, and only later uncontaminated evidence may verify it.
Main result
In corrected seed 154, the live agent froze four mixed discovery observations, generated
L1 c red k blue e + t 10.0 q 0.5, admitted it at prior 0.20, and crossed posterior 0.95 after six strictly later clean updates. Thirty-three held-out updates ended at posterior 0.999999999584 with zero discovery-evidence reuse, critical-hunger exposure, respawns, or survival failures. The claim remains bounded to the existing red/blue/probe vocabulary and one successful corrected live replication.The committed-versus-passive manipulation also reached the 0.95 red-cause threshold in 3/3 committed runs versus 1/3 passive runs across seeds 150-152. This is a small manipulation check, not a population-level significance claim.
Root causes addressed
The implementation retains strict verification, safety vetoes, MPC regret bounds, terminal rejection, canonical feature ordering, and symmetric fixed-precision evidence serialization.
Validation
python3 -m unittest discover -q— 226 tests passgit diff --checkpasses for the published scope