add factory methods for Tensor1/2/3 for specified extent#127
Merged
marcelluethi merged 1 commit intoJul 10, 2026
Merged
Conversation
benikm91
approved these changes
Jul 10, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
So far there was an asymmetry when creating Tensors. For general tensors we would write
whereas for Tensor1/2/3 we would specify only the axis, but not the full extent:
The reason is presumably, that the factory was built for initializing tensors from arrays, whose size is already known and hence specifying the extent is redundant.
This PR proposes to add factory methods that take the extent and delegates then to the standard Tensor factories. This makes it possible to create tensors like: