Add tenant-kit to Security - #575
Open
uniySimStuff wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
uniySimStuff wants to merge 1 commit into
uniySimStuff wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
tenant-kit (Apache-2.0, on npm as @quxkit/tenant-kit) implements shared-schema multi-tenancy on Postgres row-level security: a single tenancy.protect() function enables FORCE RLS and installs one policy predicate per table, so every kit or schema in an application agrees about what isolation means, and the designed failure mode of a missing scope is an empty result rather than a cross-tenant leak. Placed in Security, alphabetically after pgrls.
Disclosure: I am affiliated with QuxKit, the project this entry links.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code