Skip to content

Feature EV charging data case study and surface projects earlier - #13

Merged
cbratkovics merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/update-portfolio-to-add-ev-charging-project
Sep 20, 2026
Merged

cbratkovics merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/update-portfolio-to-add-ev-charging-project

Conversation

@cbratkovics

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Motivation

  • Surface stronger technical evidence earlier on the homepage by moving the project flashcards above Professional Experience and add a focused, recruiter-friendly case study for the new EV Charging project that preserves the site’s existing identity and component system.
  • Present the independent project "EV Charging Data: Unified Schema" as a flagship featured project that demonstrates trustworthy data foundations, source-integration, intentional metrics, quarantine/reconciliation, and evidence-backed findings scoped to v0.1.0.

Description

  • Added a data-driven project entry in portfolio/data/projects.ts for ev-charging-unified-schema and marked it featured: true so it renders as the flagship card in the canonical project collection.
  • Implemented a dedicated internal case-study route at /projects/ev-charging-data-unified-schema in portfolio/app/projects/ev-charging-data-unified-schema/page.tsx, including canonical metadata, Open Graph/Twitter fields, accessible evidence links (repository, dbt docs, findings), the full approved case-study content, and a visible As of v0.1.0 scope line.
  • Reordered homepage sections by moving Projects before Experience in portfolio/app/page.tsx, updated Navigation ordering in portfolio/components/Navigation.tsx, and added the new route to the sitemap in portfolio/app/sitemap.ts.
  • Small UI/UX updates: added reusable ProjectAction handling and internal-link support in portfolio/components/Projects.tsx, created compact case-study helpers (EvidenceLinks, Section, FindingBlock) in the new page, and added scoped case-study CSS in portfolio/app/globals.css without changing the overall visual system.
  • Kept the project-driven architecture intact (no parallel card system), preserved existing project identities, and included only the supplied quantitative claims exactly as scoped to v0.1.0.

Testing

  • Ran publication and static checks with npm run check:publication and npm run check:publication:build, both of which passed.
  • Ran code quality and verification commands npm run lint, npm run type-check, and npm test where npm test executed the content-contract suite (12 tests) and all passed.
  • Built and exercised production routes with npm run build and npm run test:e2e, where the production build completed and the end-to-end checks (homepage order, sitemap, canonical metadata, and the EV case-study route) passed; all commands reported success in this environment.
  • Attempted direct external URL status checks for the repository, dbt docs, and findings but the environment’s CONNECT proxy returned HTTP 403 so those remote checks could not be completed here; the links are present and open in new tabs from the site per site conventions.

Codex Task

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
cbratkovics-dev Ready Ready Preview Sep 20, 2026 9:55pm UTC

Request Review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-20T21:57:42.070611Z e7188ee PR opened
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-20T21:57:02.864525Z e7188ee PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e7188ee643

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +14 to +15
openGraph: { title, description, type: "article", url: path, siteName: SITE.shortTitle },
twitter: { card: "summary_large_image", title, description },

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Preserve the social image in the case-study metadata

When this case-study URL is shared, the page-level openGraph and twitter objects replace the corresponding root metadata objects, so the generated HTML contains neither og:image nor twitter:image even though the Twitter card requests summary_large_image. Add an image to both page-level objects (or reuse the site's existing Open Graph image) so social crawlers can render the intended preview.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@cbratkovics
cbratkovics merged commit ce712e9 into main Sep 20, 2026
3 checks passed
@cbratkovics
cbratkovics deleted the codex/update-portfolio-to-add-ev-charging-project branch September 25, 2026 00:11

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
Preview — e7188ee6 Deployed Sep 20, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant