Skip to content

Add DevDigest CI review - #36

Open
burnjohn wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
devdigest/ci
Open

burnjohn wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
devdigest/ci

Conversation

@burnjohn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

This PR adds DevDigest's automated review (agents: General Reviewer, Spec Conformance Reviewer) as a GitHub Actions workflow. Add the OPENROUTER_API_KEY repository secret before merging so the workflow can run.

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

DevDigest — 2 reviewers

✅ General Reviewer · ✅ Spec Conformance Reviewer

0 findings · 0 critical · 0 warning · 0 suggestion

No findings. Looks good.

✅ General Reviewer — 0 findings · 0 critical · 0 warning · 0 suggestion

General Reviewer — Approved ✅

No findings. Looks good.

✅ Spec Conformance Reviewer — 0 findings · 0 critical · 0 warning · 0 suggestion

Spec Conformance Reviewer — Approved ✅

No findings. Looks good.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

We couldn't safely recover the incremental review. No full review was started, and the last reviewed checkpoint was preserved. Retry later, or explicitly request a full review by commenting @coderabbitai full review.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
  • Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Autopilot is currently an internal CodeRabbit preview.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

DevDigest — 2 reviewers

✅ General Reviewer · ✅ Spec Conformance Reviewer

0 findings · 0 critical · 0 warning · 0 suggestion

No findings. Looks good.

✅ General Reviewer — 0 findings · 0 critical · 0 warning · 0 suggestion

General Reviewer — Approved ✅

No findings. Looks good.

✅ Spec Conformance Reviewer — 0 findings · 0 critical · 0 warning · 0 suggestion

Spec Conformance Reviewer — Approved ✅

No findings. Looks good.

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

DevDigest — 2 reviewers

✅ General Reviewer · ✅ Spec Conformance Reviewer

0 findings · 0 critical · 0 warning · 0 suggestion

No findings. Looks good.

✅ General Reviewer — 0 findings · 0 critical · 0 warning · 0 suggestion

General Reviewer — Approved ✅

No findings. Looks good.

✅ Spec Conformance Reviewer — 0 findings · 0 critical · 0 warning · 0 suggestion

Spec Conformance Reviewer — Approved ✅

No findings. Looks good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant