Repository navigation
Align gifteval protocol #57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
cyleroux
wants to merge
5
commits into
benchopt:main
Choose a base branch
from
cyleroux:align-gifteval-protocol
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
557aee9
ENH gifteval: replicate the GIFT-Eval test protocol
Cyrille-PNRIA 3808010
ENH metrics: gluonts MASE/sMAPE semantics, mask imputed targets
Cyrille-PNRIA 7899864
ENH SeasonalNaive: auto season_length, tests for the protocol
Cyrille-PNRIA b382849
CHORE: comment cleanups
Cyrille-PNRIA 10f44ac
ENH SeasonalNaive: native statsforecast quantile fan
Cyrille-PNRIA File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we don't use the mask here ? We should either call the
maefunction directly or_masked_meanwith the mask.Either way we need to pass the mask to this function.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The mask is applied right after the division:
and the objective passes valid_mask to every forecasting metric (built from the dataset nan_mask in _eval_forecasting). It doesn't go through _masked_mean because that helper uses np.mean, which would propagate the NaN of the 0/0 points; gluonts drops those points from the mean instead. I can extend _masked_mean to skip NaNs if you prefer the shared helper, but it's shared by mae/mse/mcis, so I kept the handling local to smape in this PR.