Conversation
Contributor
|
I agree. |
1 similar comment
Member
|
I agree. |
Member
|
i agree too !! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR proposes relicensing the project from LGPL-3.0 to MIT.
The main reason for this change is that MIT better reflects how we want bedrock-v projects to be used. We want the code to be easy to reuse in other projects, including commercial and closed source software without imposing copyleft requirements on downstream users.
LGPL allows proprietary software to use the project, but still places requirements on modifications to the LGPL covered code when those modifications are distributed. For bedrock-v, we don't have a strong reason to require that. If someone modifies our code, builds something useful with it or even sells software based on it, that is not something we want the license to discourage or restrict.
This is especially relevant for server software, where projects are often modified and operated as private infrastructure rather than distributed. In those cases, LGPL's copyleft requirements provide little practical benefit to us anyway.
Vote
If you have contributed copyrightable code to this project and agree to relicensing your contributions under the MIT License, please leave a comment explicitly confirming your approval.