Skip to content

docs(azul): add BASE_NODE_L2_ENGINE_AUTH_RAW to env mapping table and FAQ#1506

Open
erhnysr wants to merge 2 commits into
base:masterfrom
erhnysr:fix/add-engine-auth-raw-to-azul-upgrade-guide
Open

docs(azul): add BASE_NODE_L2_ENGINE_AUTH_RAW to env mapping table and FAQ#1506
erhnysr wants to merge 2 commits into
base:masterfrom
erhnysr:fix/add-engine-auth-raw-to-azul-upgrade-guide

Conversation

@erhnysr
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@erhnysr erhnysr commented May 22, 2026

Summary

BASE_NODE_L2_ENGINE_AUTH_RAW was missing from the op-node to base-consensus environment variable mapping table in the Azul upgrade guide, and there was no guidance in the FAQ about setting a secure JWT secret.

Changes

  • Added BASE_NODE_L2_ENGINE_AUTH_RAW to the environment variable mapping table
  • Added FAQ entry explaining how to set a secure JWT secret with openssl rand -hex 32
  • Added security note about the default placeholder value being insecure for nodes using host networking or custom port mappings

Related

erhnysr added 2 commits May 22, 2026 22:47
Adds a clarification note about using the correct RPC endpoint when building on Base.
… FAQ

BASE_NODE_L2_ENGINE_AUTH_RAW was missing from the op-node to
base-consensus environment variable mapping table, and there was no
guidance in the FAQ about setting a secure JWT secret.

Operators migrating from op-node need to know that:
- BASE_NODE_L2_ENGINE_AUTH_RAW must be explicitly set
- The default placeholder value is insecure for nodes using host
  networking or custom port mappings
- A secure value can be generated with: openssl rand -hex 32

Related to base/node#1087
@cb-heimdall
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

🟡 Heimdall Review Status

Requirement Status More Info
Reviews 🟡 0/1
Denominator calculation
Show calculation
1 if user is bot 0
1 if user is external 0
2 if repo is sensitive 0
From .codeflow.yml 1
Additional review requirements
Show calculation
Max 0
0
From CODEOWNERS 0
Global minimum 0
Max 1
1
1 if commit is unverified 0
Sum 1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants