Skip to content

docs: expand and modernize the troubleshooting-transactions.mdx#1489

Open
hongphuoc5635 wants to merge 1 commit into
base:masterfrom
hongphuoc5635:update-troubleshooting-transactions
Open

docs: expand and modernize the troubleshooting-transactions.mdx#1489
hongphuoc5635 wants to merge 1 commit into
base:masterfrom
hongphuoc5635:update-troubleshooting-transactions

Conversation

@hongphuoc5635
Copy link
Copy Markdown

What changed? Why?

  • This fits perfectly within the existing structure (no new top-level sections or major navigation changes), improves an active page, addresses common developer pain points (based on general L2 troubleshooting patterns and Base-specific features like minimum base fee/Flashblocks), and follows all guidelines. It enhances AI-friendliness, adds runnable examples, cross-links, and uses proper Mintlify components.

  • Transaction issues are a top friction point for new Base developers (nonce problems, fee miscalculations, gas limits, confirmations). Updating with complete examples, verification steps, and ties to Flashblocks/min base fee makes it more actionable.

Notes to reviewers

  • Update "Max Fee Too Low" section with a full code example using viem/ethers (popular for Base).

  • Update "Transaction Included But Failed" section with example with simulation and error handling

  • Expand Flashblocks/confirmations with integration example.

  • Add "Querying Current Fees Programmatically" for proactive troubleshooting.

  • Update Getting Help and add verification steps everywhere.

@cb-heimdall
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

🟡 Heimdall Review Status

Requirement Status More Info
Reviews 🟡 0/2
Denominator calculation
Show calculation
1 if user is bot 0
1 if user is external 0
2 if repo is sensitive 0
From .codeflow.yml 1
Additional review requirements
Show calculation
Max 0
0
From CODEOWNERS 0
Global minimum 0
Max 1
1
1 if commit is unverified 1
Sum 2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants