-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
fix: restore evidence integrity in V2 pipeline #2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
austinintelligence
merged 1 commit into
main
from
codex/perspectica-evidence-integrity-v3
Aug 3, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
Guard
updatePreferencesandupdateSearchProvideragainst overlapping calls.Both functions capture
runtimeaspreviousat call time and later callsetRuntime(previous)on failure, orsetRuntimewith the fetchedsavedvalue on success, with no sequence check. If two calls overlap, for example a preference toggle and a search-provider change fired close together, or one call resolving slower than a later one, the later-resolving call determines the final state regardless of which call started more recently:saveddata.previousrollback can undo a newer call's already-applied optimistic or committed state.Both paths silently revert or overwrite the user's most recent settings change without any visible error. The file already has prior art for this exact problem:
analyze()(Line 523) guards stale completions with a monotonicrunRefcounter. Apply the same pattern here, shared across both functions since they both mutateruntime.preferences.🔒 Proposed fix using a shared sequence guard
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents