Audit Together AI models and reasoning controls#2135
Open
rekram1-node wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Evidence
Reasoning semantics
reasoning_options = []) based on positive fixed-mode evidence.toggle; GPT-OSS uses exactlow,medium,high; DeepSeek V4 Pro uses toggle plus exacthigh,max.chat_template_kwargs={"medium_effort": true}, notreasoning_effort, and the generic schema cannot represent that transport-specific boolean accurately.reasoning = true. Their omission from Together’s serverless reasoning table conflicts with those exact pages, and no current first-party wire parameter or accepted values were found;reasoning_optionsis intentionally omitted.reasoning = truebecause its exact endpoint page classifies it as reasoning. No positive Together evidence establishes fixed/toggle/effort/budget semantics, so options remain unresolved rather than fabricated.reasoning = false: Together recommends it for reasoning workloads and markets reasoning aptitude, but does not document reasoning-token output or a fixed/toggle/effort/budget mode.reasoning = falsemodels omitreasoning_options.Metadata corrections
Matrix
google/gemma-4-31B-it,pearl-ai/gemma-4-31b-it,MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M2.5.Verification
bun validatebun test packages/core/test/sync-runner.test.ts(9 passed)git diff --checkUnresolved gaps
reasoning_effort.