Skip to content

Craft CMS has a Missing Authorization Check on User Group Removal via save-permissions Action

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Apr 13, 2026 in craftcms/cms • Updated Apr 14, 2026

Package

composer craftcms/cms (Composer)

Affected versions

>= 5.6.0, < 5.9.15

Patched versions

5.9.15

Description

Summary

The actionSavePermissions() endpoint allows a user with only viewUsers permission to remove arbitrary users from all user groups. While _saveUserGroups() enforces per-group authorization for additions, it performs no equivalent authorization check for removals, so submitting an empty groups value removes all existing group memberships.

Affected Versions

  • Craft CMS 5.6.0 through 5.9.14 (latest release at time of report)
  • Regression introduced in 5.6.0 when the viewUsers permission was added
  • Prior to 5.6.0, editedUser() required editUsers, which implicitly protected this endpoint
  • Requires Pro edition or higher (the vulnerable code path is gated by CmsEdition::Pro)

Vulnerability Details

Root Cause

This is a regression introduced in Craft CMS 5.6.0 when the viewUsers permission was added. Before that change, editedUser() required editUsers permission for accessing other users’ data, which implicitly protected actionSavePermissions(). After the change, actionSavePermissions() became reachable for users with read-only access to other users, but the underlying group-saving logic still lacked authorization for group removals.

The vulnerability has two components:

  1. actionSavePermissions() reachable with read-only access: The action only requires a control panel request and delegates to editedUser(), which now only checks viewUsers — a permission explicitly documented as "read-only access to user elements."

  2. Asymmetric authorization in _saveUserGroups(): The method checks assignUserGroup permission only when adding a user to a new group. When the groups parameter is an empty string (resulting in an empty array), the loop is skipped entirely, no authorization checks are run, and all group memberships are removed.

Prerequisites

  • Attacker has a control panel account with accessCp and viewUsers permissions only
  • Target user belongs to one or more user groups that grant additional permissions
  • Pro edition or higher

Attack Steps

  1. Attacker authenticates to the Control Panel
  2. Attacker sends a POST request to actions/users/save-permissions with:
    • userId = target user's ID
    • groups = `` (empty string)
  3. All group memberships for the target user are removed
  4. All permissions inherited from those groups are immediately revoked

Impact

  • Privilege revocation: An attacker can strip group-based permissions from arbitrary users, including accounts whose effective access derives from group membership
  • Denial of access: Users lose access to sections, volumes, and features that were granted through group membership
  • Bypass of elevated session requirement: Group removal does not trigger requireElevatedSession() (which is only triggered when new groups are added)

References

@angrybrad angrybrad published to craftcms/cms Apr 13, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Apr 14, 2026
Reviewed Apr 14, 2026
Last updated Apr 14, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required Low
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability Low
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

No known CVE

GHSA ID

GHSA-jq2f-59pj-p3m3

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.