🧪 Add tests for Lossless_Scaling_Manager ToggleLS logic#92
🧪 Add tests for Lossless_Scaling_Manager ToggleLS logic#92
Conversation
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Warning You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again! |
🎯 What: The testing gap addressed
The
ToggleLSfunction inLossless_Scaling_Manager.ahklacked unit tests because it relied on the built-inProcessExistand invoked side-effect functionsStartLSandStopLS. The environment setup also prevented simple test inclusion due to direct execution side-effects.📊 Coverage: What scenarios are now tested
Lossless_Scaling_Manager.ahkto wrap execution side-effects with condition to only run when the main script.ToggleLSto use dependency injection, accepting optional function references forProcessExist,StartLS, andStopLS.tests/Other/Lossless_Scaling_Manager_Test.ahkthat asserts:StopLSis correctly called.StartLSis correctly called.✨ Result: The improvement in test coverage
ToggleLSbehavior is now verified robustly without touching actual processes or system state.PR created automatically by Jules for task 9839411731292030670 started by @Ven0m0