Fix TopSky-Incorrect-Push workflow - #1570
Open
Liaely wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Copilot <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Collaborator
Author
@hazzas-99 I think this should fix it! I've cherry-picked the commit whilst I work on the compiler itself proper so that it can be put into practice quicker. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Partially fixes #1478
Summary of changes
Amends the TopSky-Incorrect-Push workflow to correctly validate and test. It now will be able to fail.
Screenshots
Note: There has since been minor changes to wording, but not to the logic elements since the screenshot was made.
Screenshots taken in a private testing repository.
Failure example:
Success example:
Additional information
AI (GitHub Copilot) was used to assist in making these changes (primarily for my own experimentation regarding it 🤔 ); I have tested them and understand them as if I had done them myself.